rcs914
·I don't get the short indices - that seems like a seriously boneheaded design decision with everything else that went into this.
Please consider donating to help offset our high running costs.
Called it again 😁
21 July != 20 July, even in your timezone 😉 Close but no cigar...they are upping their game...
('!=' means 'does not equal')
Ha ha ha ha, that's awesome...so they actually DID do it, a few hours (about 2) after I edited the title of this thread and my original text (21'st July 2019, the day after (GMT+1), but no doubtedly the evening of the 20th Houston time, another great nod), whilst we slept ...well played Omega, well played.
![]()
![]()
![]()
And it sure is a looker...first 321 with a display caseback.
I don't get the short indices - that seems like a seriously boneheaded design decision with everything else that went into this.
At the least I'd like to know why Omega decides on the short indices.Looks beautiful, but I don't get why anyone would get this over a very nice vintage at a fraction of the price...
Platinum... so basically, it's another 321 watch for the people already bidding in the 6-figures for vintage 321s, only new
😡