Speedmaster Mark II Racing - Redial?

Posts
3
Likes
0
Hi everyone,

I’ve been doing research for about a month now because I found a Speedmaster Mark II 145.014 on a marketplace, and I can’t decide whether I should go for it. This would be my second Omega - my first one was inherited from my late grandfather - so buying my first Omega has really been a dream of mine.

On the surface, everything looks good. The price is really attractive, maybe even too good, and that’s honestly the biggest red flag in my head. I haven’t spotted anything that screams fake or problematic, but I wanted to get some expert advice here before making a decision.

A couple of things that sparked doubts for me:
1. Hands:
• They look very fresh, almost new.
• This could mean they were replaced at some point.
• The dealer couldn’t give me details, only saying that an “Omega specialist” inspected it (not sure if authorized) and confirmed accuracy at +2 sec/day.
• Personally, I’m fine with replaced hands - I prefer something that looks clean over broken or degraded tritium.

2. Dial:
• This is where my main concern lies.
• At first glance, it looked perfect - almost too perfect.
• After zooming in, I noticed the print doesn’t seem as sharp as it should be. The numbers on the dial look slightly thicker than I’d expect, which makes me wonder if it’s a redial.
3. Logo:
• The “Omega Speedmaster Mark II” text looks mostly fine, but the number “II” seems a bit bolder than the rest of the text.
• I’m not sure if this is normal variation or another hint of a redial.

So overall, I don’t see any obvious deal-breakers, but I want to be realistic. If it is indeed a redial, that’s not necessarily a dealbreaker for me - but I’d like to know so I can adjust the price expectations.

Thanks a lot for your help and advice!
 
Posts
7,680
Likes
14,204
I'd say that is almost certainly a service dial and hands. Is it a 'T Swiss T' dial or just a 'Swiss' marking, not shown in pic. Agree the dial is rough looking, it doesn't look right. The pics aren't too good, but it looks overpolished. Be cautious and don't get caught up with price.
Edited:
 
Posts
3
Likes
0
Hey Evitzee! Yeah, that's a really good point. Due to the angle, I cannot see the Swiss-made marking. I will ask them to send a better picture.

Also, forgot to mention that the Omega horseshoe seems like there is orange paint on top of white paint, like it moved a little bit to the left while printing.

Regarding the polish, yeah but I've seen worse haha 😀

Here is another attempt to upload a better image.
I'd say that is almost certainly a service dial and hands. Is it a 't Swiss t' dial or just a 'Swiss' marking, not shown in pic. Agree the dial is rough looking, it doesn't look right. The pics aren't too good, but it looks well overpolished.

 
Posts
29,671
Likes
76,828
Hands are definitely modern. The dial looks somewhat crudely done, so is either a wonky vintage or the lume has been redone to look like tritium.

Omega still makes this dial, with luminova of course...
 
Posts
334
Likes
277
Looks to me like an Omega replacement crystal. I had my 145.014 serviced earlier this year and the new crystal obscures the markings at the bottom of the dial. No idea on the dial and handset, although my first guess would’ve been Omega service parts.

FWIW, pics of my watch are here:

 
Posts
3
Likes
0
Thanks guys! These inputs are very helpful, I appreciate them!

@Mattsky interesting, on the 4th photo from the thread you shared, the numbers in the left and bottom chrono dial appear also bolder than they should, but the right dial is ok.

@NotJackson tbh don't have issues with replacement hands and crystal if it is genuine and done in Omega Service, but the dial looks too weird for me.

Anyway, thanks for helping out. I'll give it some thought, but I doubt I'll proceed with the purchase.
 
Posts
7,680
Likes
14,204
Almost all MK II crystals have been replaced over their 50+ year lifespan, they were only a mineral glass and picked up scratches pretty easily during normal wear, they really can't be polished out with Polywatch or similar products. Many break when they are removed from the case during service. And there is quite a wide variation in official MK II crystals, the tachy scales vary a lot.
Edited:
 
Posts
7,680
Likes
14,204
Also, forgot to mention that the Omega horseshoe seems like there is orange paint on top of white paint, like it moved a little bit to the left while printing.


Here is a pic of my 1973 Mark II with original tritium dial and hands, the crystal dates from an overhaul done in 1980. The watch has been in my possession every day except when it was in for service. The mismatched orange color of the two subdial hands has been that way since the day I received the watch in 1973, never thought too much about it although today many would freak out at the mismatch on a brand new watch. The Omega symbol has that same sort of orange over white overlay, that's just how they were printed. But the 'Omega Speedmaster Professional Mark II' printing is a lot finer than shown in your pic, your's must be a service dial. Even the numbers on the subdials and the hashmarks are much finer on the original dial than the one in your pic, the printing pad pressure might have been a little too enthusiastic the day your dial was printed decades later.

Edited:
 
Posts
1,534
Likes
3,184
But the 'Omega Speedmaster Professional Mark II' printing is a lot finer than shown in your pic,
Same one mine, from 1980, and you can also see the t swiss t here on the dial to compare. So the OP is likely a service dial, and with attractive bright colours, i wonder if the hands are Tritium or Luminova ?