- Posts
- 94
- Likes
- 143
OrangeSport
路I liked the review, in the sixties they both would have been sought after and difficult to choose
Great username
Speedmaster and Submariner Comparison.
Great username
- Posts
- 11
- Likes
- 40
Anthony Perna
路Nice review and I agree!!!
- Posts
- 3,719
- Likes
- 4,200
WatchVaultNYC
路I think the Speedy Pro and the steel no-date Sub (especially the 14060(M)) have the same "personality" - no-nonsense, works well with everything, top of their respective classes. I have a 14060 incoming to replace the one I regrettably sold a year ago. If I could only have 1 watch, it would be the Sub simply because dive watch construction makes it better for beater duty. If I could only have 2, I would have both.
- Posts
- 522
- Likes
- 500
jayrock26
路Fantastic review! having owned both you need to own both but speedy is first love 馃グ
- Posts
- 534
- Likes
- 1,268
wx_073
路Nice pics and review, thanks.
- Posts
- 113
- Likes
- 217
Fernando
路Great review
- Posts
- 31
- Likes
- 17
craftandtailored
路good review!
- Posts
- 25,980
- Likes
- 27,632
ulackfocus
路Great username
I'm waiting for somebody to use HoroSapien or something catchy like that so I can put a bad pun like "the missing link" in their avatar message.
- Posts
- 16,014
- Likes
- 1,504
mdgrwl
路very detailed, - nice write up.
I owned both but got rid of the Sub after a month of owing it... just way to common out in the wild.
I owned both but got rid of the Sub after a month of owing it... just way to common out in the wild.
- Posts
- 471
- Likes
- 2,285
Steve88M3
路Can't go wrong either way. I wore my 69ST, 3570 and 16610 his week and could not fault any of them.
For the most part the Speedy and the Sub have earned the right not to be compared to anything. Both fantastic in their own ways.
For the most part the Speedy and the Sub have earned the right not to be compared to anything. Both fantastic in their own ways.
- Posts
- 22
- Likes
- 35
aldindubo
路Lookswise the Omega, but the history of Rolex wins...
- Posts
- 563
- Likes
- 1,356
chows99
路Great review! To me, both are similar yet far apart watches!
- Posts
- 880
- Likes
- 5,664
SouthernScot
路I had this choice in the sixties when my choice of 21st birthday present came down to a Speedy or a Sub which at the time both cost around 拢65.
I chose the Speedy because I was and still am a motor racing fan and used it for timing in period. Later in life when I took up sailing I did wonder if I had made the right choice but I used the Speedy with no ill effects.
Value wise of course I would be pushed to justify the cost of an 'Ed White' now. I have no idea what a 1967 Submariner might be worth in comparison!
I chose the Speedy because I was and still am a motor racing fan and used it for timing in period. Later in life when I took up sailing I did wonder if I had made the right choice but I used the Speedy with no ill effects.
Value wise of course I would be pushed to justify the cost of an 'Ed White' now. I have no idea what a 1967 Submariner might be worth in comparison!
- Posts
- 1,801
- Likes
- 10,136
- Posts
- 563
- Likes
- 1,356
chows99
路My combi is a GMT Master 16700 and a ST coming soon!
- Posts
- 101
- Likes
- 245
watchestelltime
路Best to have both but if I had to choose one it would be the rolex
