The 1040 &1041 are identical movements, just differs in stamping of SN etc, as 1041 is a chronometer examined movement. 1041 was used just in this Speedmaster 125 model and often swapped with more common 1040.
As this is basicaly Lemania movement, most of the part may still be reachable for a smart watchmaker...
If there is a need, we have here in CZ independent watchmaker workshop fully Omega, Rolex etc authorized with access to original parts and they don`t follow the recommended service prices as this is calculated on the parts and work asked/needed per each watch individually.
From the Omega tech manual -- it says that only 3 parts are different.
kind of odd that Jules Borels chart don’t match.
I think they do.
It says cal. 1041 for the Omega 125 case reference.
The list of 1041 parts is very short, because there are relatively few dedicated parts for the 1041. Most are compatible with the 1040 movement and its Lemania equivalents.
gatorcpa
But if you go to the caliber 1040 and check parts. The 1041 is not listed as compatible
I don't own one. Just odd to me. Maybe a Borel incomplete listing with the 1040 page
All the parts are compatible of course, the difference is only in stamping of those 3 1041 parts as shown in the pat catalog above and as I said in my previous post.
The base plate differs surprisingly also with different stamping, as there is stamped 1041 instead of 1040 😀)
It is not a rocket science, just accept the facts...
kind of odd that Jules Borels chart don’t match.
Also. Why would the main plate be different? Wouldn’t that affect the going train etc. if the only difference is that one is a chronometer?
someone’s wrong