Tubber
·Let’s be honest here, this is another questionable extract for an auction house.
Why is there no bracelet notation for this watch. They all came on a specific bracelet.
Let’s be honest here, this is another questionable extract for an auction house.
Why is there no bracelet notation for this watch. They all came on a specific bracelet.
Why does no mention of the bracelet type make the extract questionable? I have an extract from last year which also doesn't mention the bracelet. There is less than 300 difference in the movement number and 3 weeks difference in the production date from mine. The rest of the extract is the same.
Why does no mention of the bracelet type make the extract questionable? I have an extract from last year which also doesn't mention the bracelet. There is less than 300 difference in the movement number and 3 weeks difference in the production date from mine. The rest of the extract is the same.
In summary:
- the pushers are small
- the lancet is not correct
- the bracelet is not specified (but it is obvious that it is not his)
- the case can not contain 5.5mm puscher
- there is no connection between the serial number engraved on the back of the caseback and the movement inserted into the watch
but then at the end, what does this Extract d'Archive tell us?
ah ... right ... tells us that this movement belongs to the famous AS range officialized by OMEGA ... but the rest?
perhaps today, even if OMEGA says it, it is not a great discovery and consequently, precisely because of its limited and already known information, I consider useless this Extract d'Archive