"Sorry..Its original" , Longines

This is the response that I received when I inquired about the originality of the dial below. Now it may be original, but I feel that such an unusual dial deserves a little more discussion.


Firstly, I am puzzled by the absence of an outer track. I do not recall encountering a luminous, center-seconds, Tre Tacche without an outer track. Why would Longines compromise functionality in this regard when other aspects of the watch are clearly designed for utility?

Secondly, the cross hairs look out of place. I am accustomed to seeing cross hairs on Longines dials from the mid-1930s, such as this.


And on Longines dials from the early 1950s, such as this.


Lastly, the condition of the dial is exceptional. Not only is the surface nearly spotless but the luminous material is a perfect example of the desirable "toasted almond" hue. In conjunction with the aforementioned oddities, I believe that this is highly convenient.

What do you think?

It's a redial. However, most sellers think that if the slab of metal is still the same as the one that came out of the factory, then it qualifies as an "original dial". The paint doesn't count.

Thank you for the responses. The authenticity of the dial (or rather the paint) seemed fairly obvious but I wanted confirmation. The watch is not presently for sale though it is being flaunted by an adamant collector. The only justification that I can fathom involves the dreaded "P" word.

Its origins are unknown but the collector who has it now is not Italian.