- Posts
- 18,112
- Likes
- 27,418
Foo2rama
路路Nowhere near as grumpy as he used to be...Does anyone see anything very odd about this dial?
Something odd on FB....145.022-69 sw
- Posts
- 1,551
- Likes
- 9,984
befobe
路The 3 first pics are.... How to say.... Awful?馃榿
Hands are wrong... 145022 is very strange...
Dial...? Too poor pic quality for me...
Hands are wrong... 145022 is very strange...
Dial...? Too poor pic quality for me...
- Posts
- 18,112
- Likes
- 27,418
Foo2rama
路路Nowhere near as grumpy as he used to be...The 3 first pics are.... How to say.... Awful?馃榿
Hands are wrong... 145022 is very strange...
Dial...? Too poor pic quality for me...
might be the pictures...
but to me there is something that should not be there until after 1977. Which makes no sense as 872 service dials don鈥檛 exist.
- Posts
- 1,551
- Likes
- 9,984
befobe
路I don't see... Your idea?...馃槙
- Posts
- 18,112
- Likes
- 27,418
- Posts
- 2,510
- Likes
- 3,732
rcs914
路So I see a dial step and a pre-76 style small "S". The S looks like it has a flat bottom but I think that's artifacting.
- Posts
- 1,551
- Likes
- 9,984
befobe
路Okay... 1977 is the C3 dial, but it is a flat one, and this one is a step one... So I guess I'm not on the right way... 馃え
- Posts
- 1,551
- Likes
- 9,984
- Posts
- 18,112
- Likes
- 27,418
- Posts
- 1,551
- Likes
- 9,984
befobe
路This is a C1, with a medium S. To me, it is the same of the pic 1. But of course, a better pic would be better to compare...
- Posts
- 272
- Likes
- 224
- Posts
- 18,112
- Likes
- 27,418
- Posts
- 1,372
- Likes
- 6,072
Aludic
路路@SpeedyBirthYearWhich would also make it the only example of that I鈥檝e ever seen.
Indeed it looks weird. Looking at this first picture, I would be very careful; the hour hand looks a bit short (Mk II?) and quite bright. Perhaps it is due to the pictures, but attractive isn't the first word that springs to mind regardless.
- Posts
- 272
- Likes
- 224
Taybharr
路Which would also make it the only example of that I鈥檝e ever seen.
it is just hard to tell as the pictures are so dreadful. Something else that鈥檚 bothering me...does it look to anyone else like the proportions of the dial are off (too small print, too large subdials)? Again it could just be the pictures or this could be a complete mutant
Similar threads
- Posts
- 4
- Views
- 859
- Posts
- 19
- Views
- 3K
- Posts
- 16
- Views
- 543
- Posts
- 60
- Views
- 11K
- Posts
- 30
- Views
- 8K
