So... any of our members here have an interest in firearms?

UncleBuck · Feb 5, 2018

Bryan, I take it you've followed these a bit!

You're right, the pool is much more of a threat.

Any tykes lost their lives by wristwatch?

Aha!

voere · Feb 5, 2018

noelekal
Hi Voere;

Great tale that you share with us! Nothing like a nickel finish to get and hold the attention of the miscreants. Bet your Smith & Wesson 2-inch .38 Special was manufactured prior to 1957 when Smith & Wesson adopted the model number nomenclature (such as Model 10) for their revolvers. It displays all the features of a late-1940s to mid-1950s Smith & Wesson K-Frame revolver: "five-screw" frame (features both a larger screw at the top of the side plate and a screw at the top of the front of the trigger guard), half-moon front sight, "fish-hook" hammer spur (factory termed it the "Speed Hammer). Only thing missing is the original "diamond" walnut stock panels (which may have been swapped out for those nice newer stocks).

Would be interesting to know the revolver's serial number or at least the first four characters of the serial number. Should be a "C" prefix followed by numerals, found on the revolver's butt. The serial number is also seen elsewhere on the revolver: on the bottom of the barrel, on the back of the cylinder, on the inside of the frame and seen when the cylinder is opened. Serial number is also hidden beneath the ejector star and is stamped on the internal side of the side plate.

One just like it only in blue finish lives here. This one dates to 1951. Wear pattern indicates heavy holster use so it was likely a lawman's side arm. It's still a very serviceable revolver and I carry it from time to time.

A good bank customer of mine tried to just give it to me after they adopted an infant, saying they didn't want the gun in the house with a small child. I'd just helped them finance a swimming pool. I'd have been more concerned about the swimming pool and a small child than I would have been concerned with a properly stowed gun around a small child. Due to the revolver's market value I wouldn't accept it out right so bought the customer a pair of large decorative concrete frogs he had wanted to place around the pool's landscaping.

If I recall it is a C serial number, I have the original grips in my safe. I put the grips on the revolver so I would be able to preserve the original grips. I do not recall the year made. Next time I go into my safe I'll check the serial number.

Nice revolver you have along great story about the revolver. My Mom is no longer on the green side of the grass seeing this revolver makes me think of her. She was a very nice person. When I run into old grade school buddies first thing they would ask me. How is your Mom. All my friends liked her.

propervinyl · Feb 5, 2018

Mtek
I grew up in a hunting family, pheasant, quail, deer, elk, etc. I was also in law enforcement for a long time. I’ve carried Barretta, Sig, Glock, etc. I’ve never actually been into weapons/firearms, to me they are just tools that provide a purpose.

Only one firearm really does anything for me. A ‘60s Python handed down from me from my father.

Oh hell yeah. The finest revolver I have ever had a pleasure to shoot. An Icon. I cant wait to own one.

noelekal · Feb 5, 2018

UncleBuck
Bryan, I take it you've followed these a bit!

You're right, the pool is much more of a threat.

Any tykes lost their lives by wristwatch?

Aha!

Yeah UncleBuck I kinda have a soft spot for the ol' Smith & Wesson Military & Police/Model 10 revolver.
Put this article up on a firearms forum or two.

____________________________________________________________________________________________________

Built on the renowned K-Frame, the Smith & Wesson Model 10, previously known variously as the Smith & Wesson Hand Ejector (in earliest factory catalogs), the Smith & Wesson Military & Police (through several decades of the 20th century) and even the Victory Model (World War II military contract variants) has been in production since 1899. The famous model was first termed the Model 10 by Smith & Wesson in 1957.

Not continuous production mind you. For some months during World War I the U. S. government temporarily nationalized Smith & Wesson. From June 3 1918 to February 6, 1919 no Military & Police .38 revolvers were produced, for the government took temporary control of the factory from the Wesson family in an effort to insure higher production of the N-Frame Model 1917 .45 for wartime needs. The government took control of many companies during both World Wars in an effort to better prosecute the war.

Saving for that eight month hiatus though the revolver has been a universal and very important handgun addition to the small arms of the world. Over 6 million have been produced, all originating in Springfield Massachusetts, yet supplying every part of the globe. The revolver has been popular with law enforcement agencies worldwide, has been used in abundance by military forces of many nations, and with civilians who deem it prudent to have a serviceable side arm at hand.

Even the bad guys liked the revolver.

This one was owned by Hermann Göring.

My first handgun was purchased used over 40 years ago and it was a common garden variety Model 10 Heavy Barrel. It still sees daily use as the bedside defense choice, frequent range use, experimental handload testing, and holstered for the field or for personal defense carry. Far more rounds have been fired through it than any other center fire handgun I own. I'm wondering if it'll ever break down or if I'll die first. It's never given any trouble whatsoever.

Much is made of the need for high-capacity for personal defense or for magnum power for hiking. There are handguns on hand that meet both those perceived needs. I tend to play with those more often than I carry them seriously though, instead frequently giving the nod to the Model 10 when I have serious handgun intentions. Maybe it's only good fortune but neither revolver or its .38 Special cartridge has failed in field use since I first got the Model 10 in the mid-1970s. Since I have always had my own "fields" to hike and stomp around in, that's a lot of use.

As a tool for the lawman, perhaps the Model 10 could be looked upon as the "Glock" of the immediate post-World War II period well into the 1980s for it was the ubiquitous occupant of a large number of police holsters of the era. While Smith & Wesson's .38 revolver was popular with law enforcement agencies prior to World War II, it is said that the Colt revolver beat it out in law enforcement sales in the first four decades of the 20th century. Some say this transformation in lawman tastes occurred about the time police shooting tactics changed to more favor double-action shooting. It could be nothing more than Smith & Wesson salesmanship undercutting pricing with an easier to produce design. Agencies have always like a bargain.

M & P/Model 10s have always occupied a place here. There were more than these as I once had at least one representing every decade of the 20th century. Some have been since been traded away. These are all that I'll admit to having at present. One can always use a spare Model 10 or two somewhere on the side.

1904 5-inch nickel round butt (square butt to be first introduced in 1905). The nickel finish is degraded but clings valiantly to both front and rear sight, causing a lot of glint. The front sight blade is quite thin on these early models and the U-notch rear sight is miniscule as well. Not the best sighting arrangement for fine shooting. I love round butt K-Frames but this one's a bit of a stinker to hold. It seems thinner than the other round butts here and the original factory hard rubber stocks are slick, making the revolver more prone to squirm in one's hand. Still it's glorious to shoot the old thing. Quite elegant it is to shoot the revolver single-action with one hand.

Sharing this photo just for fun. Yep, 30 various +P factory loads and one similar handload were fired off from this very early production revolver during a .38 Special chronographing session, partially for the purpose of "proving" that the .38 Special +P is a tempest in a teapot with regards to K-Frame revolvers made prior to Smith & Wesson's arbitrary 1957 cut off year for use with +P ammunition. This has given rise to all sorts of "sky-is-falling" internet dithering over blown-up pre-1957 revolvers using the malevolent +P ammunition. No real evidence is ever forthcoming in all the dithering, hence the test with this revolver. Yeah, it's not a great idea to subject one of these elderly examples to copious quantities of +P ammunition, beating it apart to no purpose, but one can safely use +P in a pinch and even use a dab of the ammunition at the range for sight verification purposes without significantly degrading the revolver. This old wheezer was a $75 purchase, ugly as mud but mechanically tight and with good bore. After the +P test it's still just as tight.

1917-1919 4-inch blue round butt. The square butt variant introduced quickly outsold the round butt models, leaving this a comparatively uncommon configuration by World War I. The stocks on this round butt provide for an unusually fine grip for my hands, even though I have large hands with long fingers. It's most gratifying to shoot. Purchased for cheap about 10 years ago at an estate auction in Brownwood, Texas.

1926 Common 4-inch square butt blue finish. Paid an exorbitant price for this one at the time, but it was such an unusually fine example and not often seen in this condition. I thought I was a nitwit for paying so much. "So much" was $180 at closing time on a Sunday afternoon at the Dallas Market Hall gun show so that was quite a while back. Proves one doesn't pay too much for guns. he just buys them too early. This one's a great double-action shooter. This revolver as seen in this particular photo serves as my Forum avatar.

Also probably around 1926, a .32-20 Hand Ejector, also 4-inch blue round butt. Bought this one at the Dallas Market Hall show on an occasion when a friend from England was in and attending the show with me.

World War II 4-inch Square butt Parkerized. Wartime finishes used on Victory Models ran from bright pre-war commercial blue (very few early models), to sandblasted blue, to sandblasted black Du-Lite finish, to Parkerized finish later in wartime production. Also, any of the earlier Victory Models that were refinished while in military service were Parkerized, making it the most commonly seen finish. This revolver probably dates to summer of 1945. This one exhibits little sign of firing use, yet also exhibits the very smoothest double-action trigger of any K-Frame Smith & Wesson revolvers I have. Several other Victory Models I've handled down through the years also had this same smooth action feel about them.

When I was young, these things were $60-$75 at the Fort Worth gun shows, seems like for several years. Nobody paid them any attention. I was a building a budding US military arms collection and also a big Smith & Wesson fan so wanted an example, but told myself: "They're always there and cheap. I'll get around to getting one." By the time I "got a round tuit" securing one, it cost me about twice what a good one would have cost in the late 1970s. Still a "deal" compared with current market value.

The hammer spur on all the pre-war Smith & Wesson revolvers represents the most graceful, attractive, and appealing style of all to me. Unfortunately, it also ill-serves the single-action shooter with its tiny fine checkering, always prone to slip from under the thumb. Add a bit of wear to the checkering or factor in cold, wet, or oily fingers and efficient single-action cocking of the revolver is rendered a chore compared with post-war hammer spur designs. Additionally, the hammer spur design temporarily blocks one's sight picture as the hammer travels rearward during the double-action trigger pull function. This was decried by some as a design flaw back in the olden days, but it is only for the briefest instant and if one manages his double-action revolver shooting in the proper manner will give no trouble. Besides, these pre-war revolvers' actions are so smooth they materially enhance good double-action shooting. It's one of those non-issues in my opinion.

Observation on the .38 Special cartridge and ammunition.

Some denigrate the performance of the cartridge outright. While the .38 Special can be mild in target or standard loadings, is actually still mild if one uses the usual run of light-bullet loads, +P rated though they may be, the round can be an effective self-defense friend if the "right" loads are chosen and velocity performance is only enhanced if one chooses a barrel length longer than the 2-inch snub.

in 1930 Smith & Wesson worked with Winchester to introduce a special high-performance .38 Special loading to the market in conjunction with a heavy N-Frame .38 Special chambered revolver. This loading received the convoluted name of .38-44 which was suppose to connote images of a .38 Special revolver built on Smith & Wesson's .44 (read that N) frame. This factory loading was a real "stem-winder", sending a 158 grain bullet to 1125 fps, or perilously close to some of today's factory .357 Magnum loads' performance! The load wasn't recommended for lighter-framed, smaller .38 Special revolvers. But then both Smith & Wesson and Colt immediately began advertising that this potent load could be used in their smaller revolvers.

1930s Smith & Wesson and Colt advertising

(Can you imagine corresponding with D. B. Wesson or perhaps calling him on the phone?)

(Yeah, I bet a light Colt Police Positive Special would feel real cozy, belting out a cylinder-full of .38-44)

Elmer Keith did a review of the new Airweight J-Frame Smith & Wesson when it was introduced in the early 1950s by shooting something like 500 rounds of .38-44 through it and pronounced the gun a success (and manageable). Elmer would say that.

.38-44 isn't sold and hasn't been for years. The slack has effectively been taken up by Buffalo Bore and Underwood (perhaps other) and loads which effectively duplicate .38-44 performance may be purchased.

Handloaders can duplicate .38-44 performance, and without raining revolver parts down in a five-county region.

The .38 Special can be hard hitting if the really heavy loads are chosen and they have there place. The generic "Fedingchester" 158 +P load, while milder than the fire-breathers, offers worthwhile performance over standard velocity. While we're at it, I'd not feel particularly cheated if I had to defend myself with standard-velocity 158 grain .38 Special loads if the bullets were lead semi-wadcutter in design. I just don't want any lightweight jacketed 90 to 125 grain .38 Special loads, +P rated or not. Such lightweight bullets should be relegated to "inferior" cartridges like the .380 and 9mm in my view, hah!

noelekal · Feb 5, 2018

1951 2-inch square butt blue. In addition to the square butt snubs, the round butt did retain a measure of popularity for the 2-inch variants and is often seen on 2-inch Military & Police and Model 10 revolvers, especially on the comparatively rare 2-inch revolvers produced before the War in the 1930s, which is when the 2-inch variant was introduced. After World War II, 2-inch M&P revolvers can be found with both round butt or square butt equally. As a bank officer not wanting to be guilty of a RICO Act violation, I bought two large concrete turtles from a from a roadside concrete statuary business to give to a bank customer in trade for this revolver. He wanted them for landscaping his new pool, for which I'd made him a home improvement loan. He'd wanted to just give the revolver to me as his wife didn't want it in the house because they were adopting an infant son. I'd have felt better about the kid's safety with the revolver in the house rather than with the pool outside.

1954 4-inch square butt blue. This mid-century example, as well as the snub above it, feature the fairly short lived "Speed Hammer" with the "fishhook" hammer spur. Very positive for cocking the revolver for single-action use, it will wear on the thumb more in an extended range session in my view and might possibly snag clothing or equipment. This style hammer was only used for about 8 years and only on K-Frame Smith & Wesson models as far as I know. A tale on me: Not realizing it was a factory hammer spur variation, I thought the hammer spur was bent on first one of these I ever acquired. Even contemplated attempting to bend it "back" in a vise. Sold that revolver later as I thought its hammer was an unattractive design feature.

Will also share that this revolver was one of those "deals" one only infrequently stumbles upon on GunBroker. Sold online by a gun range, it was the victim of an unfortunate auction description which allowed that it had spent some years as a range rental and so was heavily worn. Because of the outright negative description nobody else bid. I was more curious about how worn it could be then actually needing it so ventured a bid that netted the revolver to me for something like $120 shipped. This was probably 10 years ago. Upon arrival, the gun was in first rate mechanical condition with an excellent and smooth action. It cannot be denied that the revolver was shot, and shot a lot though. I'd still trust it to be put to use.

1969 (Original purchase receipt shows a January 19, 1970 date) 6-inch square butt blue. This one's still NIB, unfired thought I intend to change that. I see the original owner at all the regional gun shows.

1970 The most recently acquired Model 10 and fairly hard to find in 3-inch barrel guise. Square butt blue. 3-inch Model 10s may be found featuring either the tapered barrel or the heavy barrel. A "deal" found in a Kerrville, Texas pawn and jewelry shop a few months back.

1971 Factory Heavy Barrel variant and so cataloged. 4-inch square butt blue. This one's my first handgun, acquired when I was 18 years old. It's a worn out clunk, but still the favorite. An ode to this revolver from early in my Defensive Carry days is here:

1975 4-inch square butt blue. Note the traditional tapered barrel compared with the Heavy Barrel above. I can't tell a dime's difference with recoil in shooting either one. Though I'm "joined at the hip" with the one just above, I think I like the traditional tapered 4-inch barrel best and if I "had it to do over" I'd have become "joined at the hip" with one. The tapered 4-inch barrel might be a bit more fluid, better balanced in the hand, and with more "point-ability." A pawn shop find for a "deal" of a price from years ago.

1995(?) 2-inch round butt blue. The biggest difference in this one and all others here is the loss of the "pinned barrel" feature, a traditional feature of Smith & Wesson revolvers passing from the scene in 1982, give or take a year, depending on the model. I purchased it new in early January of 1996 after ordering it some months before. Could be one of the last 2-inch Model 10s ever produced before the 2-inch barrel length was discontinued. My FFL dealer couldn't scare one up through the distributors he worked with. Said a distributor ordered it out of the factory for him. The "rosewood" hued Smith & Wesson "Dymonwood" laminated stocks were not provided with factory checkering at that time but a special order request rendered them so and at no extra cost. The action is especially smooth and the timing is a textbook example of how a Smith & Wesson should cycle.

The Model 10 family of revolvers is still relevant to a lot of folks. The Smith & Wesson K-Frame .38 Special still ought to be wildly popular as it's still very useful for a lot of handgun applications. The used handgun market contains tons of these guns and all can still serve for several more generations. The .38 Special cartridge offers a lot of flexibility. It's natural home is in the service revolvers and target revolvers in which it was originally found. The .38 Special cartridge represents so much more than the mostly weak and watery factory loads now sold (even +P) and the paltry, yet popular small 2-inch snubs in which the .38 Special is mostly found these days.

The Model 10 is still available brand new from Smith & Wesson in only a single barrel length and grip frame configuration. Ya' better get 'em while they're hot!
https://www.smith-wesson.com/firearms/model-10

The Model 10 series represents a significant contribution of real American goodness to the panoply of world handgun design milestones.

voere · Feb 6, 2018

noelekal
Yeah UncleBuck I kinda have a soft spot for the ol' Smith & Wesson Military & Police/Model 10 revolver.
Put this article up on a firearms forum or two.

____________________________________________________________________________________________________

Built on the renowned K-Frame, the Smith & Wesson Model 10, previously known variously as the Smith & Wesson Hand Ejector (in earliest factory catalogs), the Smith & Wesson Military & Police (through several decades of the 20th century) and even the Victory Model (World War II military contract variants) has been in production since 1899. The famous model was first termed the Model 10 by Smith & Wesson in 1957.

Not continuous production mind you. For some months during World War I the U. S. government temporarily nationalized Smith & Wesson. From June 3 1918 to February 6, 1919 no Military & Police .38 revolvers were produced, for the government took temporary control of the factory from the Wesson family in an effort to insure higher production of the N-Frame Model 1917 .45 for wartime needs. The government took control of many companies during both World Wars in an effort to better prosecute the war.

Saving for that eight month hiatus though the revolver has been a universal and very important handgun addition to the small arms of the world. Over 6 million have been produced, all originating in Springfield Massachusetts, yet supplying every part of the globe. The revolver has been popular with law enforcement agencies worldwide, has been used in abundance by military forces of many nations, and with civilians who deem it prudent to have a serviceable side arm at hand.

Even the bad guys liked the revolver.

This one was owned by Hermann Göring.

My first handgun was purchased used over 40 years ago and it was a common garden variety Model 10 Heavy Barrel. It still sees daily use as the bedside defense choice, frequent range use, experimental handload testing, and holstered for the field or for personal defense carry. Far more rounds have been fired through it than any other center fire handgun I own. I'm wondering if it'll ever break down or if I'll die first. It's never given any trouble whatsoever.

Much is made of the need for high-capacity for personal defense or for magnum power for hiking. There are handguns on hand that meet both those perceived needs. I tend to play with those more often than I carry them seriously though, instead frequently giving the nod to the Model 10 when I have serious handgun intentions. Maybe it's only good fortune but neither revolver or its .38 Special cartridge has failed in field use since I first got the Model 10 in the mid-1970s. Since I have always had my own "fields" to hike and stomp around in, that's a lot of use.

As a tool for the lawman, perhaps the Model 10 could be looked upon as the "Glock" of the immediate post-World War II period well into the 1980s for it was the ubiquitous occupant of a large number of police holsters of the era. While Smith & Wesson's .38 revolver was popular with law enforcement agencies prior to World War II, it is said that the Colt revolver beat it out in law enforcement sales in the first four decades of the 20th century. Some say this transformation in lawman tastes occurred about the time police shooting tactics changed to more favor double-action shooting. It could be nothing more than Smith & Wesson salesmanship undercutting pricing with an easier to produce design. Agencies have always like a bargain.

M & P/Model 10s have always occupied a place here. There were more than these as I once had at least one representing every decade of the 20th century. Some have been since been traded away. These are all that I'll admit to having at present. One can always use a spare Model 10 or two somewhere on the side.

1904 5-inch nickel round butt (square butt to be first introduced in 1905). The nickel finish is degraded but clings valiantly to both front and rear sight, causing a lot of glint. The front sight blade is quite thin on these early models and the U-notch rear sight is miniscule as well. Not the best sighting arrangement for fine shooting. I love round butt K-Frames but this one's a bit of a stinker to hold. It seems thinner than the other round butts here and the original factory hard rubber stocks are slick, making the revolver more prone to squirm in one's hand. Still it's glorious to shoot the old thing. Quite elegant it is to shoot the revolver single-action with one hand.

Sharing this photo just for fun. Yep, 30 various +P factory loads and one similar handload were fired off from this very early production revolver during a .38 Special chronographing session, partially for the purpose of "proving" that the .38 Special +P is a tempest in a teapot with regards to K-Frame revolvers made prior to Smith & Wesson's arbitrary 1957 cut off year for use with +P ammunition. This has given rise to all sorts of "sky-is-falling" internet dithering over blown-up pre-1957 revolvers using the malevolent +P ammunition. No real evidence is ever forthcoming in all the dithering, hence the test with this revolver. Yeah, it's not a great idea to subject one of these elderly examples to copious quantities of +P ammunition, beating it apart to no purpose, but one can safely use +P in a pinch and even use a dab of the ammunition at the range for sight verification purposes without significantly degrading the revolver. This old wheezer was a $75 purchase, ugly as mud but mechanically tight and with good bore. After the +P test it's still just as tight.

1917-1919 4-inch blue round butt. The square butt variant introduced quickly outsold the round butt models, leaving this a comparatively uncommon configuration by World War I. The stocks on this round butt provide for an unusually fine grip for my hands, even though I have large hands with long fingers. It's most gratifying to shoot. Purchased for cheap about 10 years ago at an estate auction in Brownwood, Texas.

1926 Common 4-inch square butt blue finish. Paid an exorbitant price for this one at the time, but it was such an unusually fine example and not often seen in this condition. I thought I was a nitwit for paying so much. "So much" was $180 at closing time on a Sunday afternoon at the Dallas Market Hall gun show so that was quite a while back. Proves one doesn't pay too much for guns. he just buys them too early. This one's a great double-action shooter. This revolver as seen in this particular photo serves as my Forum avatar.

Also probably around 1926, a .32-20 Hand Ejector, also 4-inch blue round butt. Bought this one at the Dallas Market Hall show on an occasion when a friend from England was in and attending the show with me.

World War II 4-inch Square butt Parkerized. Wartime finishes used on Victory Models ran from bright pre-war commercial blue (very few early models), to sandblasted blue, to sandblasted black Du-Lite finish, to Parkerized finish later in wartime production. Also, any of the earlier Victory Models that were refinished while in military service were Parkerized, making it the most commonly seen finish. This revolver probably dates to summer of 1945. This one exhibits little sign of firing use, yet also exhibits the very smoothest double-action trigger of any K-Frame Smith & Wesson revolvers I have. Several other Victory Models I've handled down through the years also had this same smooth action feel about them.

When I was young, these things were $60-$75 at the Fort Worth gun shows, seems like for several years. Nobody paid them any attention. I was a building a budding US military arms collection and also a big Smith & Wesson fan so wanted an example, but told myself: "They're always there and cheap. I'll get around to getting one." By the time I "got a round tuit" securing one, it cost me about twice what a good one would have cost in the late 1970s. Still a "deal" compared with current market value.

The hammer spur on all the pre-war Smith & Wesson revolvers represents the most graceful, attractive, and appealing style of all to me. Unfortunately, it also ill-serves the single-action shooter with its tiny fine checkering, always prone to slip from under the thumb. Add a bit of wear to the checkering or factor in cold, wet, or oily fingers and efficient single-action cocking of the revolver is rendered a chore compared with post-war hammer spur designs. Additionally, the hammer spur design temporarily blocks one's sight picture as the hammer travels rearward during the double-action trigger pull function. This was decried by some as a design flaw back in the olden days, but it is only for the briefest instant and if one manages his double-action revolver shooting in the proper manner will give no trouble. Besides, these pre-war revolvers' actions are so smooth they materially enhance good double-action shooting. It's one of those non-issues in my opinion.

Observation on the .38 Special cartridge and ammunition.

Some denigrate the performance of the cartridge outright. While the .38 Special can be mild in target or standard loadings, is actually still mild if one uses the usual run of light-bullet loads, +P rated though they may be, the round can be an effective self-defense friend if the "right" loads are chosen and velocity performance is only enhanced if one chooses a barrel length longer than the 2-inch snub.

in 1930 Smith & Wesson worked with Winchester to introduce a special high-performance .38 Special loading to the market in conjunction with a heavy N-Frame .38 Special chambered revolver. This loading received the convoluted name of .38-44 which was suppose to connote images of a .38 Special revolver built on Smith & Wesson's .44 (read that N) frame. This factory loading was a real "stem-winder", sending a 158 grain bullet to 1125 fps, or perilously close to some of today's factory .357 Magnum loads' performance! The load wasn't recommended for lighter-framed, smaller .38 Special revolvers. But then both Smith & Wesson and Colt immediately began advertising that this potent load could be used in their smaller revolvers.

1930s Smith & Wesson and Colt advertising

(Can you imagine corresponding with D. B. Wesson or perhaps calling him on the phone?)

(Yeah, I bet a light Colt Police Positive Special would feel real cozy, belting out a cylinder-full of .38-44)

Elmer Keith did a review of the new Airweight J-Frame Smith & Wesson when it was introduced in the early 1950s by shooting something like 500 rounds of .38-44 through it and pronounced the gun a success (and manageable). Elmer would say that.

.38-44 isn't sold and hasn't been for years. The slack has effectively been taken up by Buffalo Bore and Underwood (perhaps other) and loads which effectively duplicate .38-44 performance may be purchased.

Handloaders can duplicate .38-44 performance, and without raining revolver parts down in a five-county region.

The .38 Special can be hard hitting if the really heavy loads are chosen and they have there place. The generic "Fedingchester" 158 +P load, while milder than the fire-breathers, offers worthwhile performance over standard velocity. While we're at it, I'd not feel particularly cheated if I had to defend myself with standard-velocity 158 grain .38 Special loads if the bullets were lead semi-wadcutter in design. I just don't want any lightweight jacketed 90 to 125 grain .38 Special loads, +P rated or not. Such lightweight bullets should be relegated to "inferior" cartridges like the .380 and 9mm in my view, hah!

Great write up very informative

voere · Feb 6, 2018

I picked up the metal from the refinisher. Looks great I just finished putting the rifle back together. All is well rings are the perfect height for the scope. For now it's all just a test fit. I need to do some cleaning and oil her up. Then go have some fun at the range

voere · Feb 6, 2018

I just turned the rear ring around much better fit. I probably had it going in the wrong direction where the rear base was over lapping into the receiver bolt area. The rifle needs a very good clean up from the refinishing oil is every where All in all I'm pleased

noelekal · Feb 6, 2018

That's a good-lookin' do-it-all rifle right there.

Waltesefalcon · Feb 7, 2018

Nice looking rifle you have there Voere.

Professor · Feb 7, 2018

A not very good image of my .32 Hand ejector.
Just laid it on the scanner.

voere · Feb 7, 2018

Hey thanks everyone for the compliments
I was playing around with the rifle this morning some cleaning but not everything. I did manage to put a red dot for the safety. So I will know when the safety is on or off. I'm a little bit too far forward with the dot by about 1mm. However I'll live with that small issue.

MikiJ · Feb 7, 2018

^ ya still very easy to see, especially if I can see it 😉

Jimos · Feb 7, 2018

Up until this past weekend, the only shotguns or rifles that currently grace my gun safe have either been inherited or gifted. For what little deer or bird hunting I do, I really didn't need anything else.

This past November, I participated in my 3rd sporting clay shoot hosted annually by a customer in Florida. I really enjoy and look forward to this outing, and this year, I guess I got bit by the bug. So attached is my first ever long gun purchase, a Browning Cynergy CX, over/under. Certainly not specifically designed for sporting clays only, it still is much better suited to the sport then the 1954 A5 Belgium Browing Sweet 16 that was my grandfathers favorite field gun. A nice addition to the safe and I'm looking forward to better weather.

Lexm · Feb 8, 2018

Interest yes. I lived in San Diego, Ca, for a while and often went to different shooting ranges. Now living in europe and there is mot much fun here on loving fire arms....

speedy57 · Feb 8, 2018

Yep, you got me, Watches n guns. Two expensive toys!

MikiJ · Feb 8, 2018

Why not add cars and women to our expensive list 😀

speedy57 · Feb 8, 2018

voere · Feb 8, 2018

Red Neck rifle rest
I'm heading to the range in the morning. I do not want to lug around a heavy rifle bench rest. Using a cardboard box works well to bore sight the scope. Plus I can just chuck the box in the trash when I leave the range. Hard to imagine using the box works very well These type setups served me well on a couple hunting trips. Sometimes one has to improvise.

Mtek · Feb 8, 2018

Guys, let’s see some modded 1911s and their variants. I know you all have some.