noelekal
··Home For Wayward WatchesDoes that revolver model have a stainless steel frame or an aluminum alloy frame?
Looks stainless steel. I have a mid-1980s Model 649 in .38 Special that is all stainless steel. I really like it and it's my favorite of the J-Frame Smith & Wesson tribe. Best of both worlds. I'm not keen on double-action-only revolvers. I like having choices. The shrouded hammer offers thumb cocking for more precise shooting, yet hammer spur is protected so that it does not snag on clothing if drawn from a pocket or from beneath a coat or other covering garment.
I shot an earlier rendition of that revolver once. Was made before the advent of the lock mechanism with the required hole in the side of the frame. It was "enthusiastic" with full powered 158 grain .357 Magnum ammunition, yet was surprisingly doable in small doses. I only fired five rounds through it. I can't imagine shooting one of the Smith & Wesson Airweight models .357 Magnum. Well, I'd do it just for the experience of having done so. I imagine that the sensation would be about the same as having a pro slugger thwack one's held out and opened hand with a baseball bat.
The lock could be trouble, especially with hard kicking .357 Magnum ammunition. I experienced spontaneous lock engagements during shooting someone else's Smith & Wesson .44 Magnum not long after the lock was introduced. So did my brother-in-law when he took his turn. I'm afraid I'd have to modify the revolver by removing the lock mechanism, before I would be willing to rely on the gun.
It's a sobering feeling to have a revolver lock up during use when the ramifications are considered.
My Model 649 is in .38 Special and dates to 1985. It would have come from the factory with the rubber stocks, but I had to go all retro and install a pair of 1950s "high hump" walnut stocks on it with a Tyler T-Grip for improved handling.
Looks stainless steel. I have a mid-1980s Model 649 in .38 Special that is all stainless steel. I really like it and it's my favorite of the J-Frame Smith & Wesson tribe. Best of both worlds. I'm not keen on double-action-only revolvers. I like having choices. The shrouded hammer offers thumb cocking for more precise shooting, yet hammer spur is protected so that it does not snag on clothing if drawn from a pocket or from beneath a coat or other covering garment.
I shot an earlier rendition of that revolver once. Was made before the advent of the lock mechanism with the required hole in the side of the frame. It was "enthusiastic" with full powered 158 grain .357 Magnum ammunition, yet was surprisingly doable in small doses. I only fired five rounds through it. I can't imagine shooting one of the Smith & Wesson Airweight models .357 Magnum. Well, I'd do it just for the experience of having done so. I imagine that the sensation would be about the same as having a pro slugger thwack one's held out and opened hand with a baseball bat.
The lock could be trouble, especially with hard kicking .357 Magnum ammunition. I experienced spontaneous lock engagements during shooting someone else's Smith & Wesson .44 Magnum not long after the lock was introduced. So did my brother-in-law when he took his turn. I'm afraid I'd have to modify the revolver by removing the lock mechanism, before I would be willing to rely on the gun.
It's a sobering feeling to have a revolver lock up during use when the ramifications are considered.
My Model 649 is in .38 Special and dates to 1985. It would have come from the factory with the rubber stocks, but I had to go all retro and install a pair of 1950s "high hump" walnut stocks on it with a Tyler T-Grip for improved handling.