Please consider donating to help offset our high running costs.
Just saw this 2025 model listed for sale by a grey market dealer in Australia on a Facebook group I belong to. The listing has a close up photo of of the dial which has the features which the OP has pointed out. Adding this to the database FWIW...
I'm willing to give Omega the benefit of the doubt that this is not some kind of production defect or lax QC. They'd crazy given that this is a highly sought after collectors piece. I suspect that Omega may have more than one dial supplier or that they switched suppliers at some point, resulting in this slight variation of Snoopy on the dial. I'm fairly sure that Speedmasters in the past may have had minor variations like this even within the same reference.
What if just the dial was faked but mounted onto a current gen. Speedy?
Just saw this 2025 model listed for sale by a grey market dealer in Australia on a Facebook group I belong to. The listing has a close up photo of of the dial which has the features which the OP has pointed out. Adding this to the database FWIW...
I'm willing to give Omega the benefit of the doubt that this is not some kind of production defect or lax QC. They'd crazy given that this is a highly sought after collectors piece. I suspect that Omega may have more than one dial supplier or that they switched suppliers at some point, resulting in this slight variation of Snoopy on the dial. I'm fairly sure that Speedmasters in the past may have had minor variations like this even within the same reference.
Mine looks EXACTLY like that. That subdial looks engraved, not die stamped, at least to me. Got it February 1, 2025 at the OB.
I don't have a macro camera lens, but through the loupe mine looks perfect. All the details are there, crisp and sharply defined.
No it's not. I can see it from your pictures at a glance... you have the newer version where the feet look like one piece
Thanks for your reply. I believe that bracelet required a bit of work to make it fit ?
Thanks. I visited the omega boutique yesterday in London. They allowed me to fit the bracelet to see if it worked for me. Thankfully it’s done the trick and I’m now enjoying my watch.
I think I agree. For others, here are all the pictures he has of his Snoopy:
https://omegaforums.net/posts/2493796/
bsowers34 ·Nope. Fits the lugs perfectly, and I don't even notice the 1-2mm overhang of the end links. The 3861 bracelet are great, but I have both of those and wanted a flatlink.Thanks for your reply. I believe that bracelet required a bit of work to make it fit ?
https://omegaforums.net/posts/2495787/
bsowers34 ·Great. I like mine a LOT more on a bracelet, I went with the 57 flat link.Thanks. I visited the omega boutique yesterday in London. They allowed me to fit the bracelet to see if it worked for me. Thankfully it’s done the trick and I’m now enjoying my watch.
Pictures aren't fantastic, and there are some compression artifacts on some of them, but @bsowers34 's snoopy seems to have the problem too. I think that puts the last-nail in the "these are fakes" coffin to me.
Touche, but I think that it's being blown way out of proportion, and stand by my statement that the naked eye is not good enough to appreciate the detail in these.
At this point I just want to know Omega’s official stance on this. It’s definitely a thinner-lined Snoopy, and it lacks some delineations that were previously present, but I really don’t think it looks that bad, just different. The zipper removal is probably the most puzzling part to me.
Yeah, don't disagree here. Just curious/interested in seeing how this goes. IF I had an opportunity on a Snoopy (which I'm on/off the fence on 😁), I would probably not care about this/it wouldn't matter to me.