Please consider donating to help offset our high running costs.
I was watching too thought it will end tomorrow until I saw your thread. Seller may have an offer and relist as a buy it now so the person who offered 5500 may buy it now.
That's exactly what happened. Someone probably messaged and made an offer, the seller ended it and sent a link to the BIN. For a decent 145.012, someone got a nice price. I took the liberty of emailing the seller and telling them they could have gotten about $9,000 if they had asked around before listing. Oh well.
Bracelet is 1175 so noyt worth 9000 in my opinion it may be a 67 or 68 transitional too. Since seller doesnt have a movement pix.
Well, the seller and I had a good chat, and they are OK with the outcome. They have all the info now and will honor the sale with eyes open, so I at least feel a bit better that someone wasn't duping anyone.
In my opinion, (and I really don’t want to steer this thread into a whole “Ethics debate”) it was not your duty or place to have any discussion with the seller after the sale to let them know that they might have sold the watch for a cheaper price than they could have gotten had they left it up for auction.
Obviously, they were fine and happy with their decision to sell the watch at the price that they were offered.
With 437 feedbacks on eBay, they are obviously no “Internet newbies” and in this day and age (we’re a few days from 2020) to not be able to at least google the fact that this is not a battery operated watch, they deserved every penny that they got, and did not deserve each and every penny they didn’t... #crymeariver #noneedforheroes
The seller was actually defrauded.
In my opinion, (and I really don’t want to steer this thread into a whole “Ethics debate”) it was not your duty or place to have any discussion with the seller after the sale to let them know that they might have sold the watch for a cheaper price than they could have gotten had they left it up for auction.
Obviously, they were fine and happy with their decision to sell the watch at the price that they were offered.
With 437 feedbacks on eBay, they are obviously no “Internet newbies” and in this day and age (we’re a few days from 2020) to not be able to at least google the fact that this is not a battery operated watch, they deserved every penny that they got, and did not deserve each and every penny they didn’t... #crymeariver #noneedforheroes
In my opinion, (and I really don’t want to steer this thread into a whole “Ethics debate”) it was not your duty or place to have any discussion with the seller after the sale to let them know that they might have sold the watch for a cheaper price than they could have gotten had they left it up for auction.
Obviously, they were fine and happy with their decision to sell the watch at the price that they were offered.
With 437 feedbacks on eBay, they are obviously no “Internet newbies” and in this day and age (we’re a few days from 2020) to not be able to at least google the fact that this is not a battery operated watch, they deserved every penny that they got, and did not deserve each and every penny they didn’t... #crymeariver #noneedforheroes
how fair it is
Let’s face facts. This world is not fair.
In 2020, with an internet presence, they can’t figure out that an Omega Speedmaster is not a battery operated watch, and on top of that were told after the sale that they’re selling the watch cheap and still going to go through with the transaction then it’s on them. And if they got paid $5,500 for their “Stupidity” then Heck, they’re probably the highest paid stupid people in the entire country today! They should feel ever so lucky!