I have to say both look good, but for different reasons, so a tough choice. I’m afraid that looks where the prices are right now, just annoyed that Omega haven’t done a modern rendition of it.
Tempted to ask about the one you decline, but assume there will be a few enquiries!
The tritium dial looks bipolar contrasting with the brand new modern super luminova bezel. Also there is something about the tritium dial that looks off. Why do the "12, 3, 6, 9" have creamy patina when those were painted white and never tritium back in the day? Note how the white Omega logo, text and Seamaster script are still white but the 12,3,6 and 9 are not. That's a red flag that the tritium version may have been manipulated. On the other hand, the tritium dial might actually be legit, but just has some grime on the dial that is making the 3,6,8, 12 creamy. It's hard to say for certain from the pics. The metal on the hands on the tritium model look so clean that they might be modern replacements. The case on the tritium model looks so clean with almost no discernible wear. Is it a new case, hardly worn case or polished? By "watchco style" did someone take an old dial and stick it in a new service parts build?
I have to say both look good, but for different reasons, so a tough choice. I’m afraid that looks where the prices are right now, just annoyed that Omega haven’t done a modern rendition of it.
Tempted to ask about the one you decline, but assume there will be a few enquiries!
@bigtriangle68 here's an attempt at some macro pics of the dial -- grimy, gilt or both?
(Apologies for the picture quality)
That dial would be a hard pass for me- looks like it was “aged”
I think the opposite: it looks like a tired old dial that's been sympathetically relumed. Not 100% original but no intent to deceive. I'm new to this model but I've been around vintage watches long enough to spot artificially "distressed" dials. But I'm open to being wrong. It does say "T" at the bottom so I believe it's genuinely old rather than faux patina.
Looks like water leaked in through the original Niad crown and someone baked that dial in an oven at 450 degrees to get the water out generating hideous paint bubbles on the dial. Take a look at that movement for water damage. The patination looks so even between the hour indices and hands that it's almost like someone touched it up with a paintbrush and coffee / tea. I'd go for clean the all-Superluminova Watchco model instead of this schizophrenic 300 that tries to hard to be vintage chic.
Thanks @bigtriangle68 that's a helpful. Movement is good (actually better than the all-Superluminova one, which is running fine and keeping good time but is a little dry and dirty and in need of a service. I digress.)
I do hear what you say but -- and here I am going to sound a bit daft -- I really like this dial, knackered though it is. The faintly green SL dial ("minty" in both senses of the word) leaves me cold, whereas this is warmer: less sterile, more organic.
Thanks again to you and others for your input here. Much appreciated.