Should I buy consider buying this vintage "tropical" watch?

Posts
6
Likes
0
Hello!

I am new in this forum and this vintage watch hunt so any inputs from you guys are gladly appreciated!

I just bumped into this vintage "tropical" Omega Seamaster. Here are some details if it helps:

Year: 1954
Ref: 2491
Movement: automatic
Caliber: 344 (hammer-rotor pendulum)
Dial: tropical, with sub-seconds
Material: 14K Gold-filled
Serial: 14114523
Case size: 34mm
Lugs: 18mm

Photos:


I am not quite sure with the crown if it the original since as per researching most crowns that I found in the internet have clover crowns; however, I find the aging of the patina interesting.

So, as my (hopefully) first vintage watch, should I consider buying this watch or pass on this one. Thank you very much!
 
Posts
21,110
Likes
48,196
I think that the plating on the upper left lug is very badly damaged.
 
Posts
6
Likes
0
I think that the plating on the upper left lug is very badly damaged.

I didn't notice that. Would that be a deal-breaker for you, if ever?
 
Posts
7,475
Likes
59,743
I didn't notice that. Would that be a deal-breaker for you, if ever?

Unless the watch has been kept in a drawer for 70 years you must expect some wear and tear on the case and dial.
I have a similar aged watch and when I wear it I give the case a light rub with a jewellers cloth and it looks fine.
As my grandad used to say, “A man on a galloping horse …….” so I could live with it. There are nicks too, just above the strap, but watch photos are pretty unforgiving and highlight defects/wear the naked eye doesn’t see.
The movement looks fine and is reliable and easy to service and the hands and indices are okay too.
So, if you like it and the price is okay, everything else looks fine to me.
 
Posts
9,595
Likes
27,663
I think that the plating on the upper left lug is very badly damaged.

There is loss of plating on all four lugs, it would seem.

That is a bit of a deal-breaker to me - the patina looks good and matches the gold case, but that amount of case wear means it should be very cheap.
 
Posts
9,735
Likes
15,329
Very old ,very poor redial? (minute track)
Unlikely. Just poor QC back in the day IMO. I hate plate damage so it wouldn’t be for me either but it’s an attractive watch otherwise. The photos seem designed to hide the damage which suggests a slightly dodgy seller.
Edited:
 
Posts
7,697
Likes
26,683
No, you should not. 😁

And not only for some of the reasons mentioned above, but also because the photos show a circular scratch just outside of the central pinion where the hour and minute hands attached. That was caused by a hand having made contact with the dial, which is never a good thing, and could be caused by a damaged dial foot.
 
Posts
6
Likes
0
Thank you all for your inputs! Another guy just bought this vintage watch a while ago. The patina looks good on that, though.

Maybe this is not meant for me yet. Someday, I'll have a vintage watch and learn from you guys here. 😀
 
Posts
229
Likes
396
Thank you all for your inputs! Another guy just bought this vintage watch a while ago. The patina looks good on that, though.

Maybe this is not meant for me yet. Someday, I'll have a vintage watch and learn from you guys here. 😀

keep looking and keep posting. i m affraid you ll learn mostly by buying and somewhat experiencing yourself once you receive your watches. it takes some time and it ll not be a flawless and perfect experience. but super enjoyable if you fancy watches
 
Posts
647
Likes
1,498
1. Have you seen it in person, held it in your hands, wound and set it, strapped it on your wrist?
2. Does the seller offer a return policy?
3. What is the asking price?
4. How long have you been on the hunt?
5. Do you realize that there is always another watch down the road or around the corner?