Seamaster Redial?

Posts
1,542
Likes
3,354
Looking at this gold Seamaster 165/6-5003 but am worried it’s a redial. Still trying to get my eye in on redials, but the script looks a bit heavy and wobbly to me.

Is it a redial, and if so, would a replacement dial be difficult to source?

Thank you for advice and suggestions.
Edited:
 
Posts
766
Likes
744
Better in-focus pics with hands out of the way from the text are needed.
 
Posts
1,542
Likes
3,354
Better in-focus pics with hands out of the way from the text are needed.
OK, thanks. No other pictures available at the moment. I'll ask.
 
Posts
338
Likes
296
personally I'm not interested in a watch without having more and better pictures. it's too complicated to assess it in these circumstances
 
Posts
10
Likes
43
Hi, I would also say that the quality of the photo is too poor to say anything reliable...
 
Posts
738
Likes
1,322
From what I can see here, omega is a rich dark colour and automatic looks faded.

the seamaster word seems to go from light to dark and back again. Without better photos it’s a crap shoot but if I was looking, this photo would be enough to send alarm bells ringing so I would pass.
 
Posts
28
Likes
4
I dont think that its a redial, but I think that hands are relumed, "seamaster" and "OMEGA" are repainted. check the color difference between seamaster and omega and letter "A" is again causing a conflict. Better pictures for sure needed.