1954 Seamaster Redial or Not

dlegg0387 · Sep 4, 2026

Love the watch, but it’s missing the Swiss mark under the 6 (or isn’t visible… or I know not all actually had it)… thoughts one way or another?bonus if you have a thought on purchase price ! The movement seems to check out

JimInOz · Sep 4, 2026

My immediate impression is that it's a redial, and I would have expected a coat hanger "S", but I don't know when the round S started, so that part may be correct (but still a redial IMO).

Other more qualified will comment.

Spruce · Sep 4, 2026

This is an old photo of my 2767 calibre 354 bumper

Like your watch, it has a 14****** serial number but is marginally older than yours and as @JimInOz suggests, has the coat hanger S.

You can see that the ‘Swiss made' is partially concealed by the case and that could possibly be the same with yours but, comparing the minute markings, and it may just be the photo , mine seems to have slightly finer markings.

So, I’m inclined to agree with @JimInOz but I may be wrong.

Whether yours is or isn’t a refinished dial, it’s certainly a very nice dial and an attractive watch.

I once owned a 1959 calibre 591 and it too had a coat hanger s.

Cartesian · Sep 4, 2026

I agree that this is a re-dial: the lettering in the 'O' and 'G' of 'OMEGA', for instance, seem to be too sloppy to be original

Davidt · Sep 5, 2026

It’s a redial

1954 Seamaster Redial or Not

dlegg0387

JimInOz

Spruce

Cartesian

Davidt

Similar threads

Fake Omega Seamaster: Redial or Counterfeit?

1950s Omega Seamaster: Redial or Original Dial?

Redial or not redial

1954 Seamaster logo crown required. Where to look?

I need a bracelet for my 1954 Seamaster Calendar

Omega Seamaster 2866 Redial or Not? Cal. 501 Check