Seamaster Honeycomb Crosshair Dial

Posts
2,312
Likes
6,630
The crosshair is too bold

If one looks at the OP's picture, we see a evidence of heavy local contrast enhancement (sharpening) of the picture. This would likely make the lines appear bolder.
 
Posts
3,639
Likes
6,135
If one looks at the OP's picture, we see a evidence of heavy local contrast enhancement (sharpening) of the picture. This would likely make the lines appear bolder.
Who says the crosshair on a textured dial is bolder? Yours is really fine and well executed
My old 2652 has a fine crosshair, too.
 
Posts
3,639
Likes
6,135
Long minute hand sometimes goes over the minute marker but the second hand should stop right there.
 
Posts
14,323
Likes
41,275
Another linen dial with cross hairs for comparison. This dial is original and has not been restored.

 
Posts
323
Likes
969
I said wrong hands. Maybe I should have said wrong hands for this dial "such as it is". The second hand should not pass the minute markers. As for the dial itself, the markers at 32 and 33 (and possibly 27) are suspect.
 
Posts
1,502
Likes
5,696
Thank you very much to all of you for your responses!👍 If it's not such a clear case I think I will buy it then and make some closer pictures of it! I like the look, and wouldn't have liked to have a obvious redial. Weird that on some Refs the the second hand goes over the minute marker, like in @ConElPueblo example. If the Second Hand really looks out of place, maybe I change it for a proper one and keep it.
Thank you @Deafboy for the picture! Great piece🥰 and thanks for the close up, really helps!👍 @ConElPueblo that piece looked very nice!
Thanks to you @hoipolloi for the comparaison pictures! And the critical input.
 
Posts
2,296
Likes
19,734
Hello dear Members, I'm again on the hunt and I found this Honeycomb Crosshair Dial.
I never had any honeycomb dial and I'm not sure if this one is a redial. I find the r to be hanging to low and the Crosshair doesn't seem to be well centered. Crown isn't the right one but that's okay for me. Not sure about the Hands neither. Indexes seem to be not well placed.
What do you think?
Thank you for your help!

Original dial swapped in from another Omega would be my guess. Same goes for the hands. And quite possibly movement, too.

The crown doesn't appear correct, either.

Intrigued,

Art
 
Posts
1,502
Likes
5,696
@Dr No sounds like an interesting possibility! Really a weird watch, maybe I should just get it to solve this mystery we have here! That's the picture of the caseback, if it can give more info.
Edited:
 
Posts
2,296
Likes
19,734
Can you get images of the movement and inside of the caseback?

And, if the seller could provide a photo of the back of the dial, we'd get a better handle on whether it's refinished or original.

Art
 
Posts
1,502
Likes
5,696
Sadly not, seller says he doesn't have the tools to open the watch (which is a joke with this type of caseback). Was the first thing I asked him, I know it would be a gamble but the price is accordingly. Thank you for your help!👍 And your billiard skills are quite impressive!
 
Posts
2,312
Likes
6,630
Top: black dial 2757 shown above with colors inverted.
Middle: OP watch
Bottom: my 2635-9 SC



 
Posts
9,595
Likes
27,662
Top: black dial 2757 shown above with colors inverted.
Middle: OP watch
Bottom: my 2635-9 SC




Comparing fonts?
 
Posts
9,595
Likes
27,662
Original dial swapped in from another Omega would be my guess. Same goes for the hands. And quite possibly movement, too.

The crown doesn't appear correct, either.

Intrigued,

Art

Are there any particular reasons you suspect that this is a complete transplant? Apart from the seconds hand and the crown - which are probably the most regularly replaced items on a watch - everything seems correct to me.


Weird that on some Refs the the second hand goes over the minute marker, like in @ConElPueblo example. If the Second Hand really looks out of place, maybe I change it for a proper one and keep it.

The seconds hand does not extend over the minute/seconds track, it's just the angle of the photo that make it appear so. I haven't got many photos of this watch, but here's another where it is obvious:

220130-636e9f924d8390503d192a332fcda861.jpg
 
Posts
236
Likes
911
Top: black dial 2757 shown above with colors inverted.
Middle: OP watch
Bottom: my 2635-9 SC




Interesting is also that the White as well as the black 2757 has exactly the same fonts,the small r in Seamaster as well as the smaller r in Calendar.

The other two does not look to be a 100% match.
 
Posts
301
Likes
542
The hands are correct in my opinion.
Not sure about the re-dial question, very hard to give a sure answer...hope we can learn something more from this topic 😀
 
Posts
2,296
Likes
19,734
Are there any particular reasons you suspect that this is a complete transplant? Apart from the seconds hand and the crown - which are probably the most regularly replaced items on a watch - everything seems correct to me.




The seconds hand does not extend over the minute/seconds track, it's just the angle of the photo that make it appear so. I haven't got many photos of this watch, but here's another where it is obvious:

220130-636e9f924d8390503d192a332fcda861.jpg

I perceive a discrepancy between the color of the case and hands (yellow) with the markers (rose).

Right off the top of my head, I can't think of a single Omega reference capped in gold where the dial furniture was a different shade.

I believe the dial's authentic, though.

Best,

Art
 
Posts
1,502
Likes
5,696
Okay, will look for that detail more. Thanks didn't knew that one!👍 Sadly the watch got sold to someone else.