Seamaster calender at 6 oclock

Posts
7
Likes
3
Hi, Tim f here, I am seeking help for the seamaster calender pictured. I don't know the numbers of the movement, however from reading; the crown is no longer made, I at least need a crown and winding stem?
So if anyone could point me in the right direction Thanks in advance
Edited:
 
Posts
1,921
Likes
2,658
Was tempted to answer with six words also:

If you need them buy them

But we are friendly people here and don't write such things 馃榾
 
Posts
705
Likes
1,960
T Tim f
Need a winding stem and crown

If you are looking for part numbers, you will likely get more help if you provide the watch reference/model number

If you are looking to buy here, there are rules regarding WTB posts. (200 posts required)
 
Posts
5,427
Likes
9,285
I read it as he is selling but left off the '?'

Sooooo much open for interpretation with such a vague post that also lacks 'hi/ hello' and any form of punctuation.

Not to mention being a few posts short of meeting the requirements for a WTB or FS ad.
 
Posts
7
Likes
3

Was tempted to answer with six words also:

If you need them buy them

But we are friendly people here and don't write such things 馃榾
Very sorry, I posted a photo of said watch "seamaster calender, the winding stem is broken crown is missing in action. Sorry Im new to this as stated or requested I posted a photo, I am looking to source parts but would like to provide missing info so you fine people can help me better.
Thanks for taking time to point me in the right direction pretty sure it is known as a bump stop.
I'd like to learn more about "cad" I think that reffers to the actual movement
 
Posts
7
Likes
3
I read it as he is selling but left off the '?'

Sooooo much open for interpretation with such a vague post that also lacks 'hi/ hello' and any form of punctuation.

Not to mention being a few posts short of meeting the requirements for a WTB or FS ad.
I guess it's wtb looking for a source thank you
 
Posts
13,440
Likes
31,609
It is either a caliber 353 or 355. Stem and crown the same for both.
 
Posts
3,229
Likes
12,687
It is either a caliber 353 or 355. Stem and crown the same for both.

And they鈥檙e easily available on eBay.

The crown will be a little more difficult - depending on the reference, it might be a clover or a bowler hat style one?
 
Posts
7
Likes
3
It is either a caliber 353 or 355. Stem and crown the same for both.
Thank you, are those numbers stamped on the movement beneath the back?
 
Posts
7
Likes
3
MtV MtV
And they鈥檙e easily available on eBay.

The crown will be a little more difficult - depending on the reference, it might be a clover or a bowler hat style one?
The crown has been missing for years. I would like to get something as close as possible to signed, but there's that
 
Posts
30,843
Likes
36,282
MtV MtV
And they鈥檙e easily available on eBay.

The crown will be a little more difficult - depending on the reference, it might be a clover or a bowler hat style one?
Bowler hats are definitely more practical and less tricky for sausage fingers like mine to operate FWIW
 
Posts
3,229
Likes
12,687
T Tim f
Thank you, are those numbers stamped on the movement beneath the back?

Yes. Caliber number:


reference number:
 
Posts
3,670
Likes
6,217
I just got one - fantastic!! 馃榾馃槑
Fantastic, will stop over Japan in 3 days.
 
Posts
7
Likes
3
MtV MtV
Yes. Caliber number:


reference number:
MtV, thank you so much for your insight, as soon as I can get a ball, and access the movement I can ID what the movement is I am working with, thanks for your wisdom concerning my delema of being the greenist kid on the block
 
Posts
408
Likes
620
Hi @Tim f
Am not expert in anything but the former owner of a Seamaster "calendar at 6" from mid 50s (serial number in 14M range.

Above some photos to show ref and caliber, could you post better pics, which would help experts here on OF to help you?
 
Posts
2,485
Likes
3,952
I need a new hip.
I need new glasses.

edit: Oh did I mention I was looking for some seconds hands for a 351 and a 344. cheap. I think I found the hour hand but I am not sure which of the two is the correct one. The blurry photos here are of great help to see how they should really look.

At least this watch has hands.