dsio
··Ash @ ΩFBad photos but a very nice example of a Cal 751 Seamaster Sparkle Chronometer in steel
https://www.ebay.com/itm/115707768579
https://www.ebay.com/itm/115707768579
This website may earn commission from Ebay sales.
Please consider donating to help offset our high running costs.
Bad photos but a very nice example of a Cal 751 Seamaster Sparkle Chronometer in steel
https://www.ebay.com/itm/115707768579
Maybe its the poor photos or maybe is just me, but doesn’t it appear that there a chunk missing from the bezel near the 4 o’clock index?
I could be wrong but I think that most seamasters with a bezel have that groove, however, this bezel is misaligned and that groove should be in line with the crown. This groove does look quite large though.
In my opinion, Seamasters with that groove are modificated to accomodate an incorrect replaced crown. The original bezel didn't have the groove.
Based on those poor quality pics, it's difficult to tell if there's a groove or not on the bezel.
I'm not sure that is the case, every 166.010 and 168.024 I've seen have had that groove. Including both of mine, and both have there original crowns.
My 166.010 doesn't have. Your 3 examples show different size of that groove. I can be wrong, but again, in my opinion that's not original.
I could be wrong but I think that most seamasters with a bezel have that groove,
And you are wrong, with all due respect 😁
Happy to be corrected @janice&fred. Could you just clarify which part of my statement is wrong? I did misspeak and should have said some seamaster references with bezels have that groove.
The Issue I'm trying to figure out now is whether bezels with grooves are original or not.
I think what we’re saying is that the original bezels were intact but subsequently altered.