- Posts
- 17
- Likes
- 27
Please consider donating to help offset our high running costs.
Thats a really interesting watch.
It looks like a ref. 2767, but it is the first of these that I have ever seen with a chronometer-specification. It's from the early fifties, probably 1953 or so.
Very cool and a pretty uncommon watch both now and then 馃榾
Want to bet? 馃槈
automatic chronometer, could it be cal 500 series? want to bet!
Want to bet? 馃槈

2767* and it could be late 13* as well.
I found a few other chronometer rated 2767s by the way, one of which used to be mine
https://omegaforums.net/threads/omega-seamaster-ref-2767-chronometer-895.124741/
https://omegaforums.net/threads/seamaster-chronometer-354-question.10334/
https://omegaforums.net/threads/red...per-w-patinad-two-tone-crosshair-dial.103486/
Want to bet? 馃槈
Waiting to see if there's an O-ring sealing the caseback . . . only a photo will tell.
I'd forgotten there were chronometer-rated 2767s. Don't come across them every year, much less every day.
;-)
The caseback on the watch in question hasn't got any grooves for a caseback tool, so it has to be a snapback - that to me means it should be a 2767. I've been wrong plenty of times before though 馃榿
Seamasters with "chronometre" and "officially certified" text are uncommon, and even if the dial is tainted, they represent considerable value, much more than "ordinary" Seamasters. Your watch can probably be repaired, but please do have in mind that if the dial gets repainted, it will be unattractive to collectors and will not bring the same amount, should you wish to sell it - which I hope you will not!
Other members of this forum will know more than I do, but Simon Freese would be a safe watchmaker to ask.