Seamaster 1950's - any info please

Posts
17
Likes
27
This is my dad's Seamaster that he purchased in Malta in the 1950's. Not working currently and probably hasn't been for many years. Any info on the watch would be of interest plus advice on getting it repaired. We are in the UK.
 
Posts
9,596
Likes
27,688
Thats a really interesting watch.

It looks like a ref. 2767, but it is the first of these that I have ever seen with a chronometer-specification. It's from the early fifties, probably 1953 or so.

Very cool and a pretty uncommon watch both now and then 馃榾
 
Posts
17
Likes
27
Thats a really interesting watch.

It looks like a ref. 2767, but it is the first of these that I have ever seen with a chronometer-specification. It's from the early fifties, probably 1953 or so.

Very cool and a pretty uncommon watch both now and then 馃榾
 
Posts
17
Likes
27
Sorry I'm not very technical savvy and posted twice by mistake ! We, myself and sons, have spent hours on internet trying to find similar face but only thing we found was constellation face that looked similar.
 
Posts
1,618
Likes
6,534
We, myself and sons, have spent hours on internet trying to find similar face but only thing we found was constellation face that looked similar.

Seamasters with "chronometre" and "officially certified" text are uncommon, and even if the dial is tainted, they represent considerable value, much more than "ordinary" Seamasters. Your watch can probably be repaired, but please do have in mind that if the dial gets repainted, it will be unattractive to collectors and will not bring the same amount, should you wish to sell it - which I hope you will not!

Other members of this forum will know more than I do, but Simon Freese would be a safe watchmaker to ask.
 
Posts
17
Likes
27
Thanks everyone for all the info and advice. Attached some better pictures. I don't think there is loose luminous material, was just a bad photo by me! Will take the collective advice, get it serviced and working, new strap, polished crystal and learn to love the creme br没l茅e ! Will post the finished product and will ask watchmaker to take photos of the workings for info.
Many thanks .
 
Posts
1,618
Likes
6,534
Please keep us updated in this thread 馃榾
 
Posts
2,396
Likes
19,754
This is my dad's Seamaster that he purchased in Malta in the 1950's. Not working currently and probably hasn't been for many years. Any info on the watch would be of interest plus advice on getting it repaired. We are in the UK.

My guess would be ref 2520/2577 fitted with a cal 352 movement.

Art
 
Posts
489
Likes
2,018
automatic chronometer, could it be cal 500 series? want to bet!
 
Posts
9,596
Likes
27,688
automatic chronometer, could it be cal 500 series? want to bet!

I'll take that bet too 馃槜

If it was a full-rotor movement it would be a pretty epic franken 馃槑
 
Posts
2,755
Likes
6,808
I agree with you @ConElPueblo , ref.2627 with cal354 and I guess serial no. 14,xxx,xxx
馃榿
2767* and it could be late 13* as well.

I found a few other chronometer rated 2767s by the way, one of which used to be mine ::facepalm1::
https://omegaforums.net/threads/omega-seamaster-ref-2767-chronometer-895.124741/
https://omegaforums.net/threads/seamaster-chronometer-354-question.10334/
https://omegaforums.net/threads/red...per-w-patinad-two-tone-crosshair-dial.103486/
 
Posts
9,596
Likes
27,688

The old Omega logo is the interesting part, IMO. Never seen that on a 2767, but then again I didn't even think they came as chronometers until I googled it because of this thread 馃槵
 
Posts
2,396
Likes
19,754
Want to bet? 馃槈

Waiting to see if there's an O-ring sealing the caseback . . . only a photo will tell.

I'd forgotten there were chronometer-rated 2767s. Don't come across them every year, much less every day.

;-)
 
Posts
5,636
Likes
5,800
That were mine I'd seriously consider factory service with dial refinish.
 
Posts
9,596
Likes
27,688
Waiting to see if there's an O-ring sealing the caseback . . . only a photo will tell.

I'd forgotten there were chronometer-rated 2767s. Don't come across them every year, much less every day.

;-)

The caseback on the watch in question hasn't got any grooves for a caseback tool, so it has to be a snapback - that to me means it should be a 2767. I've been wrong plenty of times before though 馃榿
 
Posts
2,396
Likes
19,754
The caseback on the watch in question hasn't got any grooves for a caseback tool, so it has to be a snapback - that to me means it should be a 2767. I've been wrong plenty of times before though 馃榿

You're right. I was going by the appearance of the case and dial and missed the tell-tale clue on the back. Ref 2767 should be nearly identical to 2577 but with an O-ring to assist sealing instead of a threaded caseback.

Best,

Art
 
Posts
572
Likes
754
Seamasters with "chronometre" and "officially certified" text are uncommon, and even if the dial is tainted, they represent considerable value, much more than "ordinary" Seamasters. Your watch can probably be repaired, but please do have in mind that if the dial gets repainted, it will be unattractive to collectors and will not bring the same amount, should you wish to sell it - which I hope you will not!

Other members of this forum will know more than I do, but Simon Freese would be a safe watchmaker to ask.

Has anyone been in touch with Simon recently? In May, I arranged to have a watch serviced with him in June, and then everything went quiet and all subsequent emails and calls have gone unanswered. I hope he is ok, apart from anything else. It would have been my first time using him, and I would still like to do so.