Seamaster 165.001 opinion

Aquariusmatic

I didn't see this configuration of dial and hands before - so i'd like some feedback.

TheBosston

I think the "thing" that you are worried about is the missing lume inlay on the hour and minute hands. There were many different styles of hands used by omega, and the plain dauphine hour and minute hands on your example were often used by omega for their watches. I think they are legit, but the problem with those parts (not only with omega watches) is, that they are not omega marked, so it's almost impossible to tell if the hands were "original" or not. Furthermore, the dial does not look to be a redial, but I'm wondering if there ist a "Swiss Made" print on the bottom of the dial since I can't see it on the pictures you've provided ?

Aquariusmatic

There is something as far as I can see in the reflection on the metal.

Aquariusmatic

would I be overpaying it if I give 300 bucks for it?

kingsrider

7.) tension ring not fitting right, possible non-Omega crystal.
I see a gap between the dial and ring at 2:30 and 10:00

This is a tired watch. Inexpensive yes. Save your money.

Noddyman

In the UK $300 would be a good price for this model. Over here you would expect to pay £400 upwards for one in decent condition.

My personal take based on the photos:
1.) There’s colour variation in the movement so you can assume some parts have been changed/renewed.
2.) Dial is original imo.
3.) Crown is original.
4.) Hands look original.
4.) The case condition is average (case back has some clumsy tool marks/scratches). It’s not been overly polished.
5.) There’s light rotor rub marks on the case back and rotor top (this may have already been addressed in a previous service)
6.) Depending on its history you may need to factor in a service.

At $300 would I buy it? - yes probably.