Rolex GMT fanboy post

Posts
2,889
Likes
11,945
Love these pics of the new 126710. Absolutely fantastic. Unfortunately, I have zero chance of getting one from an AD so have had to make do with my own version.....
 
Posts
2,190
Likes
6,836
Looks like a nice MK1 with a rivet bracelets. Would need more pics of the case, serial #, and movement to give a proper evaluation.
 
Posts
275
Likes
1,408
Looks like a nice MK1 with a rivet bracelets. Would need more pics of the case, serial #, and movement to give a proper evaluation.
Looks like a nice MK1 with a rivet bracelets. Would need more pics of the case, serial #, and movement to give a proper evaluation.
Hi , thank you for your help. I don鈥檛 have access to the movement but this is what I found. $ evaluation is not paramount but just your expertise is much appreciated
 
Posts
2,190
Likes
6,836
again, nothing new here....looks OK to me but still not enough info there to form a solid opinion. You need to more data points....
 
Posts
275
Likes
1,408
again, nothing new here....looks OK to me but still not enough info there to form a solid opinion. You need to more data points....
Thanks for your help . I will update if I can get access to the movement.
 
Posts
2,190
Likes
6,836
also pics of the lugs, serial # etc...
 
Posts
603
Likes
2,567
Thanks for your help . I will update if I can get access to the movement.

Mark 1's didn't have black bezels, those didn't come until the mid/late 70's. Hands look replaced or at least relumed. As the serial is later than 1.8m, the dial/hands shouldn't glow to UV. The case looks correct for the serial but is polished and up to you how much polish is too much. Can't tell about the date wheel from the pictures. Bracelet correctness is dependent on if the date stamp matches.
 
Posts
563
Likes
1,356
That paper receipt from hk is so cool. If you can, Google the company and give them a call to check it's authenticity. It should be easy if the company is still around.
 
Posts
488
Likes
707
Finally joined the club. But man. I already feel like looking for another one. Not good . . .