- Posts
- 1,279
- Likes
- 672
Rolex GMT fanboy post
- Posts
- 2,034
- Likes
- 9,642
Toishome
·
- Posts
- 15,048
- Likes
- 24,051
cicindela
··Steve @ ΩF
- Posts
- 234
- Likes
- 168
fbf
·love the root beer
- Posts
- 1,279
- Likes
- 672
spacemission
·
Nice 1675/3. You must look for an original fat font insert.
- Posts
- 139
- Likes
- 413
Explorador
·In the line of duty.
- Posts
- 15,048
- Likes
- 24,051
cicindela
··Steve @ ΩF
- Posts
- 15,048
- Likes
- 24,051
cicindela
··Steve @ ΩFWhat can you guys tell me about this?
- Posts
- 2,190
- Likes
- 6,836
- Posts
- 15,048
- Likes
- 24,051
- Posts
- 2,190
- Likes
- 6,836
ATWG
·It’s for a 1675/0 model from mid 60’s to late 70’s early 80’s.
- Posts
- 728
- Likes
- 1,630
djmusicman
·It’s for a 1675/0 model from mid 60’s to late 70’s early 80’s.
It's not that simple unfortunately. Definitely 1675 though but not 16750. You could ask buenosdias or springer on the rolexforum if you really want to know which years this is correct for.
- Posts
- 2,190
- Likes
- 6,836
ATWG
·Not going to mince words here, that insert will fit those models. I’ll leave it to the geeks to duke out the meaningless obscurities that bring zero value to the table. Sorry, but been there done that with the aforementioned ‘experts’.
- Posts
- 2,889
- Likes
- 11,945
- Posts
- 161
- Likes
- 719
leefowler
·Again some difficult decissions to be made!!
- Posts
- 4,908
- Likes
- 69,064
CPRwatch
·My 1999 16700 , one owner from new . Me .
- Posts
- 2,190
- Likes
- 6,836
ATWG
·
- Posts
- 1,279
- Likes
- 672
- Posts
- 251
- Likes
- 671
- Posts
- 251
- Likes
- 671
fergusm
·
Similar threads
- Posts
- 2
- Views
- 753
- Posts
- 0
- Views
- 176
- Posts
- 0
- Views
- 1K
