- Posts
- 1,337
- Likes
- 706
Rolex GMT fanboy post
- Posts
- 2,053
- Likes
- 9,667
Toishome
·
- Posts
- 15,048
- Likes
- 24,057
cicindela
··Steve @ ΩF
- Posts
- 234
- Likes
- 168
fbf
·love the root beer
- Posts
- 1,337
- Likes
- 706
spacemission
·
Nice 1675/3. You must look for an original fat font insert.
- Posts
- 139
- Likes
- 413
Explorador
·In the line of duty.
- Posts
- 15,048
- Likes
- 24,057
cicindela
··Steve @ ΩF
- Posts
- 15,048
- Likes
- 24,057
cicindela
··Steve @ ΩFWhat can you guys tell me about this?
- Posts
- 2,212
- Likes
- 6,890
- Posts
- 15,048
- Likes
- 24,057
- Posts
- 2,212
- Likes
- 6,890
ATWG
·It’s for a 1675/0 model from mid 60’s to late 70’s early 80’s.
- Posts
- 739
- Likes
- 1,676
djmusicman
·It’s for a 1675/0 model from mid 60’s to late 70’s early 80’s.
It's not that simple unfortunately. Definitely 1675 though but not 16750. You could ask buenosdias or springer on the rolexforum if you really want to know which years this is correct for.
- Posts
- 2,212
- Likes
- 6,890
ATWG
·Not going to mince words here, that insert will fit those models. I’ll leave it to the geeks to duke out the meaningless obscurities that bring zero value to the table. Sorry, but been there done that with the aforementioned ‘experts’.
- Posts
- 2,889
- Likes
- 11,948
- Posts
- 161
- Likes
- 719
leefowler
·Again some difficult decissions to be made!!
- Posts
- 5,058
- Likes
- 71,531
CPRwatch
·My 1999 16700 , one owner from new . Me .
- Posts
- 2,212
- Likes
- 6,890
ATWG
·
- Posts
- 1,337
- Likes
- 706
- Posts
- 251
- Likes
- 671
- Posts
- 251
- Likes
- 671
fergusm
·
Similar threads
- Posts
- 2
- Views
- 611
- Posts
- 1
- Views
- 157
- Posts
- 1
- Views
- 126
