aesguerra
路I have to say, I'm a bit (and the Omega Man in me is pleasantly) surprised at how the movement in my OP36 (ref 116000) is stacking up against my SMPc (ref 212.30.41.20.03.001). More accurate would be how the Rolex seems to slightly lag behind the Omega in performance.
Same routine for two timepieces that were brand new: Give both a full wind, wear the watch for a week, noting time gain/loss each day, then take it off for and see how long as it takes for the mainspring of both 48hr power reserve engines to run out of juice.
Rolex OP36: -4s a day, 46hrs 25mins
Omega SMPc: -1sec a day, 49hrs 10mins
It's pretty interesting that the Rolex can't meet its own Superlative Chronometer standard (although it's still within COSC). Of course, it's still early on, and several have told me to give it a bit of time to "settle in" before passing judgement. As for the power reserve, I guess the Rolex, while completely adequate, wants me to be "more active". 馃槣 Point taken, Hans. Haha. But it does give me a bit of evidence that MAYBE Omega's automatic movements are a bit better at converting the wearers movements into stored mainspring energy, and to actually exceed their rated endurance.
Not knocking Rolex. I love both brands that reside in my collection. Just sharing my observations.
Cheers,
Alex
Same routine for two timepieces that were brand new: Give both a full wind, wear the watch for a week, noting time gain/loss each day, then take it off for and see how long as it takes for the mainspring of both 48hr power reserve engines to run out of juice.
Rolex OP36: -4s a day, 46hrs 25mins
Omega SMPc: -1sec a day, 49hrs 10mins
It's pretty interesting that the Rolex can't meet its own Superlative Chronometer standard (although it's still within COSC). Of course, it's still early on, and several have told me to give it a bit of time to "settle in" before passing judgement. As for the power reserve, I guess the Rolex, while completely adequate, wants me to be "more active". 馃槣 Point taken, Hans. Haha. But it does give me a bit of evidence that MAYBE Omega's automatic movements are a bit better at converting the wearers movements into stored mainspring energy, and to actually exceed their rated endurance.
Not knocking Rolex. I love both brands that reside in my collection. Just sharing my observations.
Cheers,
Alex
Edited: