Redial or not? Omega Seamaster date on 6

Locked
Posts
4
Likes
1
  • Good night guys! I saw this particular model and a doubt went in my mind. First I could not find it's reference in the omegamuseum site and then I searched in the web and could not find an Omega with date on 6 that it doen't say Semaster Calendar. What do you think?
    relogio-omega-seamaster-726711-MLB20623059752_032016-F.jpg relogio-omega-seamaster-362711-MLB20623058377_032016-F.jpg relogio-omega-seamaster-677611-MLB20623363620_032016-F.jpg relogio-omega-seamaster-254711-MLB20623364569_032016-F.jpg Thanks!
Solved, thanks!
Edited by a mod:
 
Posts
13,478
Likes
31,757
A bad redial. Fonts aren't even remotely close.

Tired movement too.

A complete MESS!
 
Posts
5,503
Likes
9,402
Looks like the query in the original post needs to be undeleted for future education?
 
Posts
8,711
Likes
14,616
Looks like the query in the original post needs to be undeleted for future education?
Good idea, if for no other reason than to let me see the watch.
 
Posts
4
Likes
1
The pictures are not mine, they were from the ad of the auction I won, but already gave it up. Sorry, the low price blinded me...
I started my vintage collection in the end of last year. Now I have an Omega Seamaster Monte-Carlo quartz, a Rado "r-line", an early "curvex" ORIS and a blue Tissot PRS 516 GL.
 
Posts
1,210
Likes
1,690
What did I miss? 🙁
The OP deleted the pictures of an ugly redial, and also seems like he won an auction and is not paying...
 
Posts
15,048
Likes
24,054
  • Good night guys! I saw this particular model and a doubt went in my mind. First I could not find it's reference in the omegamuseum site and then I searched in the web and could not find an Omega with date on 6 that it doen't say Semaster Calendar. What do you think?
    relogio-omega-seamaster-726711-MLB20623059752_032016-F.jpg relogio-omega-seamaster-362711-MLB20623058377_032016-F.jpg relogio-omega-seamaster-677611-MLB20623363620_032016-F.jpg relogio-omega-seamaster-254711-MLB20623364569_032016-F.jpg Thanks!
Solved, thanks!