Question for the Gallet experts

Redialers often don’t seem to bother with fletching detail on arrows. Personally, these dials seem ok.

I am not a Gallet expert, but having looked at many '30s and '40s chronograph dials, these look original.

IMO ….The hour hand is correct. it needs a blue baton minute and either a boat tail or round tail chrono hand.

I discovered that the dial I repainted was probably a Gallet. My program matches that exactly including the covered 11 and 12. The other dial has lume dots rather than the number.
The watch currently has syringe hands on it. Here is a new photograph of the dial with the hand.
The other watch is missing all but the hour hand.

Not sure why I did it this way. The minute hand hub is still mounted. The movements have not been cleaned and one of them is missing a bridge jewel on the sweep balance. My guess is that I was more interested in testing the dial making process. The crystal is a recent addition as the movements and cases are all mixed up. The hand either broke sometime in the last decade or so. Or I saved the hub as I had intended to see if I could make new hands using the grinding laps I got back in the 1990s.
I am also including the master artwork I created. This is why I think I over painted the Gallet dial. I used the standard fonts and kerning rather than to match the existing fonts. So the maker name is off centered. I may have combined elements from different dials to create this fantasy.

-j