Post your Longineseses'

Posts
396
Likes
173
I didn't suggest it does , I was just trying to forestall suggestions that it might! I also don't believe that it is anything to do with the solid lug necessarily following the curve of the case.
 
Posts
2,804
Likes
4,886
Anyone care to suggest why a classy looking 18ct European watch with this exceptionally unusual case would have solid lugs?
Fixed bars were quite common during this period, regardless of case material. They were common on military watches as they offered greater security, but they are also found on gold watches likely for strength and durability.


https://www.pinterest.co.uk/pin/319403798543788056/
 
Posts
2,804
Likes
4,886
Anyone care to suggest why a classy looking 18ct European watch with this exceptionally unusual case would have solid lugs?
P.S. The case has fake Longines markings so it is certainly "exceptional," as you say. An authentic, gold, Swiss Longines case-back would have a maker's mark, a Helvetia, a serial number (given the period), and be much better executed. Below is a photo for posterity.

 
Posts
396
Likes
173
I know it sounds clever to say that sort of thing but You don't believe that, do you?
 
Posts
2,804
Likes
4,886
I know it sounds clever to say that sort of thing but You don't believe that, do you?
Not exactly sure what you are referring to. You think it merely sounds "clever" to say that gold watches had fixed bars for strength and durability? Gold is a soft material. Spring bars were usually made of harder metals that could wear down the lug holes over time. Also, many gold cases were quite delicate so a fixed bar added rigidity. I cannot say with complete certainty that this is why many gold cases from the 1930s and 1940s had fixed bars but it seems a reasonable explanation.
 
Posts
2,804
Likes
4,886
Adding another example with fixed bars (there are many) and an authentic case-back, for reference. I should have said above that an 18K case would have a Helvetia and a 14K case, a squirrel.

 
Posts
2,804
Likes
4,886
Why hasn't your case got the proper EF Longines markings? It looks a bit like someone has engraved the word LONGINES in the back?
The EF Longines markings you are referring to would not be proper on a gold case from this period. The word LONGINES, as it appears, is correct. Take a look at other Longines with gold, Swiss-made cases from the mid-1930s and 1940s and you will see that the case markings on the cal. 27.0 (above) and 13ZN (below) I have posted are normal.
Curiously for an 18ct watch with a movement that colour, it also doesn't have a shock absorber
This can be explained by the serial number. Regardless of finish (e.g. rhodium, gilded) or case material, Longines movements with serial numbers earlier than around 5.7 million will not have shock protection (possibly with very few exceptions). Even early "tre tacche" sports watches did not have shock protection.


(eBay item number: 283910415582)
Edited:
 
Posts
8,742
Likes
69,437
Delivered to the retailer in 1959, and to me a couple of weeks ago. What happened in between will remain a mystery.

 
Posts
431
Likes
740
Delivered to the retailer in 1959, and to me a couple of weeks ago. What happened in between will remain a mystery.

Beautiful, love to patina.
 
Posts
1,885
Likes
24,843
ftKsflv.jpg
 
Posts
7,293
Likes
76,574
Yes I wore this one yesterday, but it’s still on my wrist.



...and, for more pleasure, a bit of a sex-pile:

 
Posts
3,086
Likes
3,585
Yes I wore this one yesterday, but it’s still on my wrist.



...and, for more pleasure, a bit of a sex-pile:

Now we're talking.
PR is my favorite Longines after the 13ZN