PLS Help me to identify this vintage OMEGAs...

Posts
4
Likes
2
Hey there...

I've came across this ladies watch & tried to identify model on google, but no joy.
The model number is hardly readable, but it looks like 10180487 & serial number on movement is 9321123.
To me it looks like they might be from 30s or 40s maybe, but I have no idea about watches.
Also what they would be worth in this condition? The'yre fully working, but obviously need some attention.


Can anybody help me PLS?

Thank you...

 
Posts
20,239
Likes
46,931
Yes, it is from the late 30s or early 40s, and it was probably a man's watch. They were smaller at the time. I suppose that the movement is a cal 26.5 of some variety. Not terribly valuable, but a nice enough little watch. 👍
 
Posts
4
Likes
2
Yes, it is from the late 30s or early 40s, and it was probably a man's watch. They were smaller at the time. I suppose that the movement is a cal 26.5 of some variety. Not terribly valuable, but a nice enough little watch. 👍

Thank you...I've thought it was for ladies as diameter of the case is approx. 280mm...It's really small 😀...
 
Posts
20,239
Likes
46,931
Thank you...I've thought it was for ladies as diameter of the case is approx. 280mm...It's really small 😀...

That's the size of a dinner plate. 😁
 
Posts
1,286
Likes
2,840
Looks to me like all 3 hands are odd. I think second hand is correct and both minute hand and hour hand are incorrect. I think it should have plume hands. Dial appears to be in nice condition but clearer pics would help 😀
 
Posts
20,239
Likes
46,931
Looks to me like all 3 hands are odd. I think second hand is correct and both minute hand and hour hand are incorrect. I think it should have plume hands. Dial appears to be in nice condition but clearer pics would help 😀

I'm not sure what a "plume" hand is, but I think the minute hand is probably correct. Feuille hands were sometimes used with Arabic hour dials.
Edited:
 
Posts
1,286
Likes
2,840
I'm not sure what a "plume" hand is, but I think the minute hand is probably correct.
These are plume hands and were commonly found on late 30s early to mid 40s Omega’s. I only own one omega with these hands, and they match the OPs second hand. Here’s an example of plume hands I’ve taken from google:
If the minute leaf hand is correct then the second hand is incorrect.
 
Posts
20,239
Likes
46,931
These are plume hands and were commonly found on late 30s early to mid 40s Omega’s. I only own one omega with these hands, and they match the OPs second hand. Here’s an example of plume hands I’ve taken from google:

Thanks for that, I had forgotten about those hands. You're right that those are common on 1930s watches. It's quite hard to say in this case when all three hands are different. The sub-dial hand looks too short to me, so I was assuming it had been replaced, and I like feuille hands with arabic numerals. 😀
 
Posts
1,286
Likes
2,840
Thanks for that, I had forgotten about those hands. You're right that those are common on 1930s watches. It's quite hard to say in this case when all three hands are different. The sub-dial hand looks too short to me, so I was assuming it had been replaced, and I like feuille hands with arabic numerals. 😀
Yeah it’s much more common to find them in 30s than the 40s but I just bought a ‘44 30T2 with these hands and have seen 2 other watches of the same case reference (and hands) dating ‘43, so they do come into the 40s too but are much less common 😀
 
Posts
1,286
Likes
2,840
Thanks for that, I had forgotten about those hands. You're right that those are common on 1930s watches. It's quite hard to say in this case when all three hands are different. The sub-dial hand looks too short to me, so I was assuming it had been replaced, and I like feuille hands with arabic numerals. 😀
I think a clearer photo would make it easier because I agree the sub second hand looks short BUT it could have a very fine tip that we cannot clearly see 😀
 
Posts
217
Likes
239
Hi all, many thanks for this discussion and valuable information you've shared.

I think overall it's a nice watch, I especially liked the condition of the pretty unpolished case and the dial. The model reminds me of Suverains but the font for the numerals don't match the common examples so I can't exactly call it that.

Looks to me like all 3 hands are odd. I think second hand is correct and both minute hand and hour hand are incorrect. I think it should have plume hands. Dial appears to be in nice condition but clearer pics would help 😀

May I hesitantly add something to this: I also believe that we have three different hands on a single watch but not sure which one is the original. I think the plume hand for the second is indeed from the era. However, the minute hand ("leaf" model) is often found in 1940s Omegas (even a simple "omega 1940s" search on Google gives plenty of fine examples), though it's mostly used in Calatrava models. But admittedly, never saw a Dauphine hand (the one for the hour hand) on a model with Arabic numerals which is why I want to exclude that as a starting point.

Btw, could we call the dial "tropic"? I'm colour-blind so please excuse my misinterpretation 😀
 
Posts
1,531
Likes
1,084
Cal 26,5 indeed. Nice dial! Not sure about the hour hand... at least hour and minute hands do not match. Still a nice piece.
 
Posts
4
Likes
2
Thanks everyone for your input...

That "280mm" was a typo...I've meant 28mm (at least I know, why it's called "Cal 26.5" 😁)
Regarding to hands I'm not really sure, but checked some google images like the one below & they look odd to me as well...
Hour hand looks like "Dauphine", but the minute one looks like "Leaf"...Will post better pics tomorrow...