Ploprof Case Orientation - the (disputed) final word

Posts
542
Likes
1,518
Hi All,
It's been ages since I've had a good look around the forum so please excuse me if this has indeed been covered before...

Now with full access to the Omega Extranet I can finally settle an old argument. For years, examples of ‘upside down’ or reversed Ploprof’s have been around. The general consensus had been that they were modified to be that way or even worse, a Watchmaker put them back together after service incorrectly....which is hard to fathom because the date disc is different between the crown at 9 and crown at 3 versions.

So with that in mind, YES, I can confirm that both versions were manufactured by Omega. There is even a way to tell the configuration of the watch when it left the factory.

In the first photo you’ll see what is considered the correct orientation, crown at 9, or left. Note the Omega engraving inside the case back, it is triangle shaped and is the right way up.

Now look at the second photo, you’ll see the triangle is also the right way up but the case is reversed, or in the crown at 3 position.

So the triangle always orients the case....original crown at 3 position watches and those that have been converted later on will now be relatively easy to confirm.

 
Posts
9,596
Likes
27,705
I've seen the issue of the caseback text covered before and I'd like to ask - I have no dog in this fight, so to say - if you are certain that this upside-down engraving is an intentional design choice by Omega and not just a quirk of production? And if it really is so (a separate, intentional variation), why doesn't it have an unique reference number? As you say, the date disc would have to be different between the two variations, so in order to find the correct part you'd assume that Omega made a distinction between the two cases.

Or do you have some sort of confirmation from Omega themselves that this is the way to distinguish between the two, identically named references?
 
Posts
4,629
Likes
9,346
I've seen the issue of the caseback text covered before and I'd like to ask - I have no dog in this fight, so to say - if you are certain that this upside-down engraving is an intentional design choice by Omega and not just a quirk of production? And if it really is so (a separate, intentional variation), why doesn't it have an unique reference number? As you say, the date disc would have to be different between the two variations, so in order to find the correct part you'd assume that Omega made a distinction between the two cases.

Or do you have some sort of confirmation from Omega themselves that this is the way to distinguish between the two, identically named references?
Good Questions in my opinion.....

We are talking about a Swiss company here... there has to be some documentation on a material list somewhere ......

Good Hunting

bill
 
Posts
542
Likes
1,518
This is information directly from the Omega Extranet, their in-house computer reference system, I have an Omega authorised workshop....

'The Ploprof with case ref. 166.0077 exists in 2 versions. One with crown at 3 o’clock and one with crown at 9 o’clock.
The engraving in the caseback is the only reference point to tell which version you should have. The triangular OMEGA engraving is always facing up.'
 
Posts
1,668
Likes
5,908
Good to see that confirmed from Omega, I'm intending to buy a Ploprof at some point in the near future and had been wondering that very point about the cases.
I picked up a nice Ploprof dial as a spare last year so i have a start 😜
 
Posts
8,257
Likes
19,449
Interesting. I assume both the case and caseback have the same part number ( meaning for both variants) right? So the difference would be the thread configuration on the case? caseback? In order to achieve the desired position of the triangle?

😕
Edited:
 
Posts
17,938
Likes
37,514
Interesting. I assume both the case and caseback have the same part number, right? So the difference would be the thread configuration on the case? caseback? In order to achieve the desired position of the triangle?

😕

Well, actually, there is no caseback. It's just a stainless steel brick with a hole in the front.
 
Posts
8,257
Likes
19,449
Well, actually, there is no caseback. It's just a stainless steel brick with a hole in the front.

agh! now makes sense! thx!
 
Posts
16,863
Likes
47,901
Will both cases fit each configuration....
 
Posts
659
Likes
1,349
Both cases fit each configuration. It's only the stamp inside that case that is different. You just need a regular datedisc for cal 1002 to set it to righthand crown.
 
Posts
4,629
Likes
9,346
Both cases fit each configuration. It's only the stamp inside that case that is different. You just need a regular datedisc for cal 1002 to set it to righthand crown.
Hi guys


I just still find this odd. It almost like they rewrote history .... if there were two configurations and you need different date wheels . It would have been documented when these were produced . There would have Been some mention in hard copy material lists .

Just to restate this I find it odd ... I would love to ask John Diethelm “ the computer “ as he was working there at the time .....

Bill
 
Posts
659
Likes
1,349
I didn't mention that these where regular in both ways…just wanted to clear that the case is 1:1 the same only the stamp is upside down.
 
Posts
16,863
Likes
47,901
Well if there are two date wheels. What else would the different date wheel fit besides a upside down polprof
 
Posts
659
Likes
1,349
One datewheel is for the leftsided crown because you need to turn the dial 180° and then the regular datewheel would not be exactly in the window. The other ones are just the regular ones for all cal. 1000 watches with rightsided crowns.
 
Posts
946
Likes
2,077
i still don't believe it cuz one can't operate the bezel (one handed) with the upside down config 👍
 
Posts
16,863
Likes
47,901
One datewheel is for the leftsided crown because you need to turn the dial 180° and then the regular datewheel would not be exactly in the window. The other ones are just the regular ones for all cal. 1000 watches with rightsided crowns.

So is the date wheel that is needed for the reverse to normal only suitable for a reverse polprof ?
 
Posts
2,828
Likes
4,722
Well if there are two date wheels. What else would the different date wheel fit besides a upside down polprof
One of these, seen in l/h and r/h configuration.
 
Posts
659
Likes
1,349
So is the date wheel that is needed for the reverse to normal only suitable for a reverse polprof ?

Yes
 
Posts
1,668
Likes
5,908
As well as the silver date disc, there is also a yellow date disc listed with the stem at 9 for the 1000 series movements so maybe there are other watches with it