Ploprof Case Orientation - the (disputed) final word

Posts
542
Likes
1,518
http://www.ploprof.com/PloProf.html

seems to me the "inverse/reverse" proplof is a myth, a result of servicing by someone who cant obtain the correct date disc for the 1660077

I’ll take the information from Omegas online resource system for Watchmakers over a third party website any day.
 
Posts
542
Likes
1,518
i still don't believe it cuz one can't operate the bezel (one handed) with the upside down config 👍

Actually, you can.....it’s quite easy, just tried both ways myself
 
Posts
946
Likes
2,077
Actually, you can.....it’s quite easy, just tried both ways myself
Yes i know i had a upside doen myself. But it’s not an acceptable usage especially when u wear gloves ... but as we live in a free word everybody can belive whatever he likes.
 
Posts
13
Likes
13
I’ll take the information from Omegas online resource system for Watchmakers over a third party website any day.

I have access to the Omega extranet so I can see what you are saying, the Ref113ST1660077 is laser engraved for a 3 o'clock crown/date, having serviced a lot of these watches I am still not convinced, it would be interesting to see an extract for the case in question in the original post.
Edited:
 
Posts
946
Likes
2,077
I have access to the Omega extranet so I can see what you are saying, the Ref113ST1660077 is laser engraved for a 3 o'clock crown/date, having serviced a lot of the watches I am still not convinced, it would be interesting to see an extract for the case in question in the original post.


The case in question might be an early prototype case ...
 
Posts
1,344
Likes
1,966
This is information directly from the Omega Extranet, their in-house computer reference system, I have an Omega authorised workshop....

'The Ploprof with case ref. 166.0077 exists in 2 versions. One with crown at 3 o’clock and one with crown at 9 o’clock.
The engraving in the caseback is the only reference point to tell which version you should have. The triangular OMEGA engraving is always facing up.'

Who came up with this information? It sounds like nonsense to me. If the museum don't have this information, then I find it unlikely that it is a reliable source on the extranet

Just to be clear the silver date wheel(and yellow for gold watches) that is orientated for crown at 3 o’clock is for many Omegas that use cal 1000 series movements, Devilles, Constellations, Seamasters etc.
The date wheel which allows the movement to have the crown positioned at 9 o’clock is only for the SM1000(cal1012) 166.093 and the Ploprof 166.077.

You could use that date wheel to create 'Destro' Seamaster 'shom' or baby Ploprof SM200, but I don't think any of these left the factory set up this way, neither do I believe the SM600 was built with the crown at 3o’clock.

As has been said it is much more difficult to use in this configuration on either wrist, so why would you do it?

As the standard Cal 1002 date wheel used on 99% of watches is not for the Ploprof, it makes perfect sense that when replaced watchmakers would order the wrong part and make the watch back up with the dial fitted upside down, possibly without even noticing the mistake.
Edited:
 
Posts
1,344
Likes
1,966
Just as an aside, why would the case stamp have any bearing on the build, it does not add up. The case manufacturer probably had no interest or idea which way the dial was orientated. It is much more plausible that it was a glitch when they were made and some were stamped in different orientation.

I can't imagine the watchmaker at Omega sitting at his bench, making up Ploprofs and choosing the date wheel based on which way up the case was stamped.
 
Posts
946
Likes
2,077
Who came up with this information? It sounds like nonsense to me. If the museum don't have this information, then I find it unlikely that it is a reliable source on the extranet

Just to be clear the silver date wheel(and yellow for gold watches) that is orientated for crown at 3 o’clock is for many Omegas that use cal 1000 series movements, Devilles, Constellations, Seamasters etc.
The date wheel which allows the movement to have the crown positioned at 9 o’clock is only for the SM1000(cal1012) 166.093 and the Ploprof 166.077.

You could use that date wheel to create 'Destro' Seamaster 'shom' or baby Ploprof SM200, but I don't think any of these left the factory set up this way, neither do I believe the SM600 was built with the crown at 3o’clock.

As has been said it is much more difficult to use in this configuration on either wrist, so why would you do it?

As the standard Cal 1002 date wheel used on 99% of watches is not for the Ploprof, it makes perfect sense that when replaced watchmakers would order the wrong part and make the watch back up with the dial fitted upside down, possibly without even noticing the mistake.


i just tried for fun to operate it on the right hand wrist with top-down .... i am a left hander so not a total idiot handle things with my left hand, but the destro setup on the right hand makes it totally inoperable as the only chance to push red button is with your thumb, so u have to rotate the bezel simultaneously with your pointing and whatever finger ..... no no no that doesn't work at all ....
 
Posts
3,861
Likes
8,804
Good to see that confirmed from Omega, I'm intending to buy a Ploprof at some point in the near future and had been wondering that very point about the cases.
I picked up a nice Ploprof dial as a spare last year so i have a start 😜

Is it a service dial you picked up?
 
Posts
1,344
Likes
1,966
I have access to the Omega extranet so I can see what you are saying, the Ref113ST1660077 is laser engraved for a 3 o'clock crown/date, having serviced a lot of these watches I am still not convinced, it would be interesting to see an extract for the case in question in the original post.


Hi All,
It's been ages since I've had a good look around the forum so please excuse me if this has indeed been covered before...



We have seen a case with the engravings reversed on the forum before, it had a short movement number, which would indicate either prototype or service replacement. I remember the owner went to the museum and got an extract to say it was a prototype and (I think based on the current configuration of the watch, and the engravings) that it was originally a Destro.

I think a fair amount of assumption was made by the museum about this, and it was not based on any records. Is this where the new information on the extranet has been derived from?

So it would be interesting to know where @photo500 your picture of this reverse printed case came from, and is there a movement number to go with it?
 
Posts
2,446
Likes
7,040
A more fundamental question: who needs to know the date while diving?

tenor.png
 
Posts
946
Likes
2,077
A more fundamental question: who needs to know the date while diving?

tenor.png

As the ploprof was designed and intented for professional usage and not for hobby pool divers with crowns, it needed to have a date as the divers stayed several days underwater also for decompression e.g. in hydra 1 mission the decompression time was 5 days ...
 
Posts
288
Likes
209
The destro, or inverted Ploprof existed as a factory version, this is confirmed fact. J.Wallis Ploprof book is nice, but outdated source of info, theory about mad watchmakers inverting watches because lacking correct date wheels is busted myth .
I can confirm that in Omega extranet are both versions as was stated above and the inverted version can be recognized by orientation of the stamped triangle, the top points always to 12 o`clock.
Also here you have ref of the two data wheels: 1000-1580A - inverted version, crown at 3; 1000-1589A - normal ploprof version, crown at 9.
And because people believe only what they see, here you go:
 
Posts
1,344
Likes
1,966
The destro, or inverted Ploprof existed as a factory version, this is confirmed fact. J.Wallis Ploprof book is nice, but outdated source of info, theory about mad watchmakers inverting watches because lacking correct date wheels is busted myth .
I can confirm that in Omega extranet are both versions as was stated above and the inverted version can be recognized by orientation of the stamped triangle, the top points always to 12 o`clock.
Also here you have ref of the two data wheels: 1000-1580A - inverted version, crown at 3; 1000-1589A - normal ploprof version, crown at 9.
And because people believe only what they see, here you go:

You have made quite a few suppositions. I see no evidence of anything you have stated here.

The extranet parts list proves nothing except 1000 series watches have at least 3 types of date wheel depending on what case they are for, gold, crown at 3 and crown at 9 o’clock.

Saying the orientation of a crown is dictated by the case stamp is also wrong. The SM1000m is always crown at 9 o’clock and yet the stamped triangle points to 6 o’clock.

That the watch is very difficult to use in inverted dial format, and has no benifits in that configuration make it hard to believe it would be put togeather like this originally.

That extract is also based on the same suppositions you have made and not actual archive data, and so in my mind not evidence of fact.
 
Posts
4,629
Likes
9,346
The destro, or inverted Ploprof existed as a factory version, this is confirmed fact. J.Wallis Ploprof book is nice, but outdated source of info, theory about mad watchmakers inverting watches because lacking correct date wheels is busted myth .
I can confirm that in Omega extranet are both versions as was stated above and the inverted version can be recognized by orientation of the stamped triangle, the top points always to 12 o`clock.
Also here you have ref of the two data wheels: 1000-1580A - inverted version, crown at 3; 1000-1589A - normal ploprof version, crown at 9.
And because people believe only what they see, here you go:

Hi @Knudsen1971

Not sure where your getting your facts etc....

I would use "old " Omega docs as a reference and not the current extranet to prove parts... etc...

I personally will still disagree with your conclusions... Just for your info ... I been collecting Omegas for a while. I have talked with old Omega watch service centers over the years all said the same thing to me about the date wheel is unique for the 600m ... and if the standard one was used it would have to flip the orientation of the crown.

Case stamping as a tale tail is also hard to believe.

Good Luck in making your case.

Bill
 
Posts
5,598
Likes
9,420
The destro, or inverted Ploprof existed as a factory version, this is confirmed fact. J.Wallis Ploprof book is nice, but outdated source of info, theory about mad watchmakers inverting watches because lacking correct date wheels is busted myth .
I can confirm that in Omega extranet are both versions as was stated above and the inverted version can be recognized by orientation of the stamped triangle, the top points always to 12 o`clock.
Also here you have ref of the two data wheels: 1000-1580A - inverted version, crown at 3; 1000-1589A - normal ploprof version, crown at 9.
And because people believe only what they see, here you go:

Is a Myth, always was a Myth. Makes no sense as a PLOPROF. kind regards. achim
 
Posts
18,202
Likes
27,530
Date wheel change is needed due to location of the date window. Opposite the crown and next to the crown.

So tell me which other watch needed a date wheel with numbers printed at a different angle to line up with the window?
 
Posts
1,344
Likes
1,966
Date wheel change is needed due to location of the date window. Opposite the crown and next to the crown.

So tell me which other watch needed a date wheel with numbers printed at a different angle to line up with the window?


The SM1000m 166.093. Well you did ask😉
 
Posts
18,202
Likes
27,530
The SM1000m 166.093. Well you did ask😉

As that watch only came in one variation why does omega part numbers show a LH/RH part number?

My personal feeling is that it was an option like the other Speedy bezels. I do not think the orientation of the inner logo had anything to do with how it left the factory.

Also the use of gloves argument is a non starter. If used for deep sat timing which I doubt it was neither orientation would work with those gloves. Shallow water no glove or light gloves would be about equal in use. I’ve tried one on and could use it in either orientation with no gloves and feel it would be slightly more difficult with light weight dive gloves I use. My cold water thick gloves neither orientation would work with them.