Please help identify this Seamaster Heirloom

Posts
10
Likes
21
My father in law, a pilot of 50 years passed away and he left me his Omega Seamaster. The watch appears to be 30-40 years old and according to what he told me , he never got it serviced but it's keeping perfect time

My question

Please help me identify the model number of this watch. Also where can I find the serial number ?
 
Posts
1,502
Likes
5,696
Hello and sorry to hear about your loss.
It's a really nice Watch with a 5 Row beads of rice bracelet with 11 Endlinks. The Reference Number is inside the Caseback, it's probably a Ref.166010. If you want to wear it, you should bring it to an independent Watchmaker in your Area. We can recommend you some, if you tell us where you are located.
 
Posts
10
Likes
21
Thank KingCrouchy. I'm in Austin TX.

What's the right way to care for this watch - do I restore it or keep as is ?
 
Posts
31
Likes
47
Thank KingCrouchy. I'm in Austin TX.

What's the right way to care for this watch - do I restore it or keep as is ?

If this were my watch I’d have it ultrasonically cleaned and serviced. Nothing else. What a beautiful memento, very sorry for your loss.
 
Posts
356
Likes
581
Just a service. Tell them NOT to buff it. Don’t change a thing on that watch. What a beautiful piece that will remind you of your Father In Law every time you look at your wrist.
 
Posts
94
Likes
379
Handsome watch and hoping it brings you good memories with time.

For a gentle service you might try Martinez & Hood @ Burnet/Koenig or Austin Classic Watch & Jewelry just north up Burnet a few blocks away. Be specific about whether you want any polishing done or not (I would lean towards the latter, other than maybe the crystal).

And yes the model# is inside the case back but does look like a 166.010 to my amateur eyes. The serial number will be stamped on the movement.
 
Posts
1,502
Likes
5,696
Thank KingCrouchy. I'm in Austin TX.

What's the right way to care for this watch - do I restore it or keep as is ?
I would just service the watch, replace or polish the glas. If you polish the case, it will loses some of the lines of the Design and the watch will not look the same as worn by your Father in Law. He wore it and looked down at this watch on his wrist, so it would be a nice way to remember him.
Btw. If you don't like the nice bracelet or wish to change the look from time to time, you could easily put any watchstrap that is 18mm large.
We are glad to help.👍
 
Posts
16,307
Likes
44,936
Fantastic watch and among the most coveted from this era- your FIL had great taste, as most pilots usually do.
Agree with all that been said, and I will stress as have the others that you only want a service and clean done to this watch (independent watchmaker with Omega experience, do not take it to an Omega store!) . Polishing the crystal is fine- as long as there are no hairline cracks and it’s only surface scratches (a wet sand can usually bring a crystal back to perfection). Replacement factory crystals are available and won’t hurt the value or originality of the watch.
Most watchmakers will hit the watch with a buffing wheel to “make it shiny”, and that’s death to a vintage piece like this with its sharp case lines and contours that play the light-it will soften the edges like a lozenge.
If the case looks dull to you, a light hand buff with an impregnated polishing cloth will remove a surprising amount of surface gunk that an ultrasonic clean may even miss. Opinions are all over the map on hand polishing but unanimously all agree-no machine polishing!
I love these on that BOR bracelet, but as Crouchy said, they look equally sharp on a strap and can even be dressed down with rustic leather or a NATO strap.
 
Posts
358
Likes
404
Here is what over polishing does..... What a shame.
s-l1600.jpg
 
Posts
2,876
Likes
1,957
This looks very different from the 166.010. More likely the ref is 166.009 with calibre 562 movement. The serial number on the movement will tell more about the age, but it's more than 50 years old already.
 
Posts
2,326
Likes
1,884
Here is what over polishing does..... What a shame.
s-l1600.jpg

What, aside from it's not all marked up, do you not like about it? Facets remain. Edges are still reasonably sharp.

Tom
 
Posts
16,307
Likes
44,936
What, aside from it's not all marked up, do you not like about it? Facets remain. Edges are still reasonably sharp.

Tom
That’s not the worst of the cough drop polish jobs but I think those edges couldn’t cut soft butter. It was a little over- loved.
 
Posts
16,307
Likes
44,936
This looks very different from the 166.010. More likely the ref is 166.009 with calibre 562 movement. The serial number on the movement will tell more about the age, but it's more than 50 years old already.
Looking at it again, I agree with you- it has more of the earlier beefy lug style than the sleek oyster style case of the 010. But the S is post ‘63ish so is in the middle somewhere. It’s a great looking watch none the less and the OP should be proud to wear it.
 
Posts
1,144
Likes
3,111
Depending on what your style is, you can take the bracelet off and put a vintage style leather band on. Brown or black will look fantastic. The Beads is rice are great, but for me, I wouldn’t wear it often with the bracelet. It all really depends on how your dressing most days.

Here’s a 166.037

 
Posts
10
Likes
21
How much can I expect to pay for a service, cleaning and a new crystal ?
 
Posts
16,307
Likes
44,936
best Bet is to get a few estimates from some of the recommendations above, ang get an idea of their pricing. I would hazard a guess of $250-400 for a full service if it doesn’t need any parts. Then add parts to that. They generally don’t know what it may need until they get into it. I may be running, but some of the high precision parts may be out of spec from years of running dry.
 
Posts
4,963
Likes
18,397
This looks very different from the 166.010. More likely the ref is 166.009 with calibre 562 movement. The serial number on the movement will tell more about the age, but it's more than 50 years old already.
+1
 
Posts
9,934
Likes
15,605
Looking at it again, I agree with you- it has more of the earlier beefy lug style than the sleek oyster style case of the 010. But the S is post ‘63ish so is in the middle somewhere. It’s a great looking watch none the less and the OP should be proud to wear it.
I disagree about the S. That font style is seen commonly in the late 1950s. I think that watch is a transition from the 50s fat lug models to the lighter 60s designs. At a guess it’s from 1960-62 and could be from the 5 digit era, or as suggested above an early 166.009, as that has the notched lugs.
Edited: