Forums Latest Members
  1. cchen Aug 30, 2022

    Posts
    573
    Likes
    1,149
    As a former 1st gen owner of the Pelagos, I really enjoyed it's utility and robustness but found that it wore too large and was too thick (for my wrists at least). I eventually sold that one off and dreamed of the day when Tudor would make a smaller version.

    Today they announced the 39mm (again with a cringeworthy launch video - note to Tudor, you really need a new marketing agency).

    I like it but am not loving it:

    WR dropped to 200m (ok yes I complained about the thickness but 500m WR makes pelagos what it is)
    Micro-adjusting clasp dropped

    Thoughts?


    [​IMG]
     
  2. Vercingetorix Spam Risk Aug 30, 2022

    Posts
    3,266
    Likes
    5,255
    Needs to lose Pelagos and officially certified text, at a minimum.
     
    Duracuir1, bigtriangle68 and DaveK like this.
  3. STANDY schizophrenic pizza orderer and watch collector Aug 30, 2022

    Posts
    16,351
    Likes
    44,920
    Side on shot needed. Is it still hockey puck sided ?


    Edit: Don’t worry Yep still a hockey Puck

    A016A8E6-DF8B-4A24-B761-B7EA5E2FA230.jpeg
    226FA9B1-72F1-48F2-A936-3106C8A89B29.jpeg
     
    Caliber561 and Nobel Prize like this.
  4. mcemeren Aug 30, 2022

    Posts
    362
    Likes
    2,559
    Looks nice to me. The thickness is around 12mm similar to BB 58 as far as I can find out.
     
  5. Pete2021 Aug 30, 2022

    Posts
    49
    Likes
    106
    I think that's a lot of watch for the money. £3500 for a titanium diver with both bracelet and rubber strap included.

    Thinner at 12mm (roughly) than the normal pelagos with the only downside a reduced wr. Who is really taking this below 200m though.

    39mm may be a bit small for some tastes and the fact I can only see it in black is the only real drawback (I like the blue)

    Not sure it beats the fxd for me.
     
    Axel Brass likes this.
  6. Pete2021 Aug 30, 2022

    Posts
    49
    Likes
    106

    Insta is saying 11. 8mm
     
    blufinz52 likes this.
  7. GuiltunderGlass Aug 30, 2022

    Posts
    248
    Likes
    536
    Right, it's a tad slimmer than a 5513, accounting for the plexi if I'm not mistaken. Not bad considering the portly BB Pro and the BB58 is 11.9mm.
     
    Axel Brass likes this.
  8. Pete2021 Aug 30, 2022

    Posts
    49
    Likes
    106
    Clasp is adjustable apparently.
     
    Screenshot_20220830_161314.jpg
    Axel Brass and blufinz52 like this.
  9. blufinz52 Hears dead people, not watch rotors. Aug 30, 2022

    Posts
    2,756
    Likes
    6,930
    I like the case dimensions. Nice looking watch.
     
    Duracuir1 likes this.
  10. spacemission Aug 30, 2022

    Posts
    922
    Likes
    455
    This tudor is a good toolwatch. I think that the submariner is overpriced.
     
    Thommas and bigtriangle68 like this.
  11. vitriol Aug 30, 2022

    Posts
    982
    Likes
    2,914
    Finally a wearable Pelagos:)
    39 x 11.8 case, no date, lumed bezel, titanium - to me that all makes this watch the best Tudor release since original Black Bay in 2012.
     
  12. foxtrot Aug 30, 2022

    Posts
    205
    Likes
    607
    11.8mm THK, OMEGA PLEASE TAKE NOTE OF THAT VALUE!!...COMPARE WITH THE PO 39 AT 14.5mm?...
    I FEEL TUDOR IS AWARE OF THE NEEDS OF THEIR FOLLOWERS.
     
  13. bigtriangle68 Aug 30, 2022

    Posts
    198
    Likes
    78
    They also need to get the Tudor GMT on a diet and slim it down to 16570 dimensions.
     
    MtnMarine likes this.
  14. bigtriangle68 Aug 30, 2022

    Posts
    198
    Likes
    78
    Exactly! The "Chronometer" line of text is enough. To be a COSC chronometer it has to be certified. Tudor doesn't need to put "officially certified". It's redundant! That extra line of text just lards and clutters the dial. Leave the excess dial text to Rolex.

    As Robin Williams said: "In the dictionary under redundant, it says 'see redundant.'"
     
    perenowell, noelekal and Duracuir1 like this.
  15. vbrad26 Aug 30, 2022

    Posts
    4,149
    Likes
    21,458
    Well, if the video taught me anything...it is that I;ve been saying Pelagos wrong.
    Pel"AH"gos. Not Pel"UH"gos...got it lol.
     
  16. KeithS Aug 30, 2022

    Posts
    1,096
    Likes
    13,551
    I’m not sure how anyone at Tudor could watch this and think: “yeah, that’ll make people want to buy this watch.” If anything, it has the opposite effect on me.
     
    noelekal, Duracuir1, cchen and 2 others like this.
  17. Scarecrow Boat Burt Macklin, FBI Aug 30, 2022

    Posts
    5,306
    Likes
    23,745
    “This is the new Pelagos. Yet, it is not just “another” Pelagos. It is very much a Pelagos. But it is different… You can use it as a Pelagos of course.”

    That video was horrendous
     
  18. eugeneandresson 'I used a hammer, a chisel, and my fingers' Aug 30, 2022

    Posts
    5,001
    Likes
    14,594
    If they do that in the same blue as the current one ... ::love::
     
    savka likes this.
  19. Scooterino36 Aug 30, 2022

    Posts
    874
    Likes
    2,687
    I honestly thought it was a spoof after that opening.

    EDIT: only to say that Tudor has my attention. Eagerly awaiting the reviews.
     
    Edited Aug 30, 2022
  20. vbrad26 Aug 30, 2022

    Posts
    4,149
    Likes
    21,458
    I still sort of think that it was. And if its not, then yeah. Brutally bad.
     
    GuiltunderGlass and Scooterino36 like this.