Paypal Will No Longer Refund Fees?

Posts
8,195
Likes
19,296
..The swipe/processing fee is not near enough to pay for cashbacks...

someone else is paying for my cash back as I don't carry a balance and my card has no annual fee 馃槣
 
Posts
17,732
Likes
26,912
someone else is paying for my cash back as I don't carry a balance and my card has no annual fee 馃槣
You are by far a minority. Also yup that's the way to do it. But if you do carry a balance its what 20% or higher?

馃榾
 
Posts
8,195
Likes
19,296
.But if you do carry a balance its what 20% or higher?..馃榾

you obliged me to look at the fine print....

馃榾
 
Posts
17,732
Likes
26,912
you obliged me to look at the fine print....

馃榾
Not bad, now is it advertised with a 18 month free transfer? If so whats the fee on that? That's low for a card with cashback!!!! I'm having a hard time finding that one lol. I'd be tempted to move to it. Does it have a minimum monthly transaction to qualify for no fees?

Almost all no fee cards start at 16% but most people are higher then that. With a cap out of 27%!!!!

I guess my point is unless you carry no balance your not normally ever getting your any benifits.
 
Posts
8,195
Likes
19,296
Not bad, now is it advertised with a 18 month free transfer? If so whats the fee on that?

nope, has nothing to do with transfer offers, is the the APR on the card, adjusted as it indicates, prime + 4.5%, no annual fee.
 
Posts
2,498
Likes
7,577
anyone using/tried an alternative to PP?
 
Posts
3,719
Likes
4,201
anyone using/tried an alternative to PP?
I'm seeing significant increase in Zelle, bank transfer, and wire payments. Also notice people on the forum mentioning Transferwise more and more. All of the above are generally fee-less or low-fee, though offer no built-in buyer protection, which limits its use to just mostly well-known sellers. Watch buyers will likely insist on Paypal or F2F with individual sellers. Bottom line best I see it is that this hurts individual sellers and collectors most.
 
Posts
1,344
Likes
1,960
I have used Escrow.com. It seems a good alternative
 
Posts
2,058
Likes
4,634
Definitely crushes private sellers and collectors.
 
Posts
1,241
Likes
3,861
Bottom line best I see it is that this hurts individual sellers and collectors most.
This is especially true when you add it to the eBay buyer protection program...

Now when a buyer gets cold feet and complains about something you鈥檝e sold, you not only have to accept a return (when you offered no returns), but you get to pay 3.4% + thirty cents for his lack of good sense.

The buyer focus on eBay was already bad enough - total disregard to the sellers they profit 10% of sale pieces and shipping... Add this and I am hopeful for a new marketplace.
 
Posts
5,419
Likes
9,272
Hmmm, maybe this will encourage sellers in general to provide more/ better photos and descriptions of the goods they are selling, in order to reduce the potential for returns. There could be a silver lining...
 
Posts
3,719
Likes
4,201
Hmmm, maybe this will encourage sellers in general to provide more/ better photos and descriptions of the goods they are selling, in order to reduce the potential for returns. There could be a silver lining...
Already happens on Ebay. Seller pays for returns on SNAD claims (lets ignore for the moment that this is often abused by the buyer to escape paying for buyers remorse returns). So there is already a built in incentive for sellers to describe as properly as possible - you lose money if you don't, its a fact.

If you ask me, the only clear thing that the "no refunds for fees" promotes is clearly.. no returns/no refunds

T... Add this and I am hopeful for a new marketplace.

Competitors like Tradesy and Poshmark are already nipping at Ebay's heels even with much larger commissions (in the 20% range), but they provide a much better experience. For example, you sell a watch on Poshmark? If it's over $500 you ship it to their facility and they will authenticate it for the buyer for free. Buyer's remorse return on Tradesy? Never happens, because if its as described they will take the return and sell it themselves. They dont send you back the return and claw back the buyer's payment

Chrono24 IMO is the best watch marketplace around. Commissions 3-5% (plus a reasonable monthly fee), and you get to talk to real people when you have an issue. In fact my support guy, Michael, I actually know who he is, what he looks like, spoke with and shook his hand several times, and have seen the watches he wears. Compare that to the robot reps on Ebay/Paypal

Returns are a big facet of commerce, especially high value goods that you don't get to inspect live before you buy them - i.e. used watches. To create friction (i.e. costs) in the return process is not good for buyer or seller. Whenever possible, costs to do a return should be minimized to keep everyone happy. Until recently I was supplying watches to a certain watch business that may be familiar to some/many (starts with the letter "T"), and was getting a crazy high return rate from them, significantly higher than the return rate from any other sales channel. This is not sustainable, I thought. And a few months later I got a letter from their lawyer. "T" had gone bankrupt, and they still owed me money for stuff they bought.
Edited:
 
Posts
3,719
Likes
4,201
Update:

Heard this over at the e-commerce forum - due to overwhelmingly bad feedback, Paypal is not moving forward with this new policy. Fees will continue to be refunded when you return money. Good news!
 
Posts
2,306
Likes
5,639
Update:

Heard this over at the e-commerce forum - due to overwhelmingly bad feedback, Paypal is not moving forward with this new policy. Fees will continue to be refunded when you return money. Good news!
Wow, that's great to hear!