I just found a GREAT blog, story, article (on the net) about these watches.
http://www.christies.com/features/Omega-Seamaster-300-1966-Deconstructed-5897-1.aspx
the last paragraph really puts this watch into perspective.
"In addition to outfitting professional civilians, Omega outfitted British naval and terrestrial forces through its official agent, Omega Watch Co. England. But take note: 166.024s, like this one, were the
only civilian Seamaster 300s available with the ‘Big Triangle’ dial (featuring a large triangle marker at 12 o’clock; it was also available with the standard Arabic numeral indicator at 12). These are not to be confused with the British military ‘Big Triangles’, which were specially designed to meet British Ministry of Defense specifications. Unlike civilian ‘Big Triangles’, these watches(sic
the British Military ones) were a
non-date caliber with special engravings on the case back and fixed bars at the lugs. In today’s vintage market, authentic civilian ‘Big Triangle’
non-date SM300s do not exist."
Since 'this' article shows (pictures) a watch 'without' the date lens, can I assume using a 'date lens' would not be.... 'authentic' (even though Omega clearly sells a date lens crystal).... ??