Overpolished Seamaster 300 2551.80?

Posts
396
Likes
584
Still trying to calibrate my sense of how much polishing people with more knowledge/experience than me are willing to tolerate (if any). Penny for your thoughts on the following two examples? @SOG53
Edited:
 
Posts
373
Likes
445
Scalloped bezel appears unpolished.

From the side profile, the case appears symmetrical, but polished/refinished. The crown guards look overpolished (might be wrong, though).

Case is not too bad, though. However, for my extreme case of OCD, I only go for unpolished watches 😀.
 
Posts
211
Likes
124
Both watches look nice. Definitely polished but not overpolished imo.
 
Posts
396
Likes
584
Went with the second example. If it's been polished, perhaps only very subtly/tastefully?
 
Posts
211
Likes
124
Went with the second example. If it's been polished, perhaps only very subtly/tastefully?
It looks polished to my eye but not in a bad way.
 
Posts
396
Likes
584
D drster
It looks polished to my eye but not in a bad way.
Ah what features make you think so? For instance, don't the edges look pretty sharp? And there is no softening on the edges of that small ding, right?
 
Posts
351
Likes
1,444
Is there a general rule of thumb on polishing watches or does it come down to personal preference.
 
Posts
396
Likes
584
Is there a general rule of thumb on polishing watches or does it come down to personal preference.
Both? haha. In general, the older the watch, the more imperfections, including polishing, are tolerated. In terms of polishing, the giveaways are case edges that are no longer sharp and well-defined, and similarly for the edges of dings on polished surfaces. I think it's safe to say that most enthusiasts/collectors vastly prefer original case profiles with all the character that comes with age and use over a watch that has had that character (attempted) to be polished out, especially if the tradeoff is softened case lines. Here's an extreme example that I think I saved from Speedmaster101.
 
Posts
351
Likes
1,444
Both? haha. In general, the older the watch, the more imperfections, including polishing, are tolerated. In terms of polishing, the giveaways are case edges that are no longer sharp and well-defined, and similarly for the edges of dings on polished surfaces. I think it's safe to say that most enthusiasts/collectors vastly prefer original case profiles with all the character that comes with age and use over a watch that has had that character (attempted) to be polished out, especially if the tradeoff is softened case lines. Here's an extreme example that I think I saved from Speedmaster101.

Thank you for your response. The difference in the two photos are clear to see and very helpful. The AD who sold me my Seamaster 300M told me to bring my watch in as often as I want for free polishing. I think I'll just enjoy the patina as it evolves over time.
 
Posts
1,586
Likes
2,311
Just bear in mind: you’ve come to an Omega enthusiasts’/collectors’ forum. People here (myself included) care about originality, including original lines/bevels in the same way car enthusiasts might prefer an unrestored classic to one that looks flawless using newly fabricated parts.

But most of the millions of people who buy Omegas couldn’t possibly care less about this, and would prefer to wear a watch that looks shiny and new, even if some of the edges are slightly soft as a consequence. And there’s absolutely nothing wrong with that.

I sent off a modern Seamaster that I recently bought preowned to get it serviced, and I requested “light refinishing” too. I wouldn’t do that with a really expensive or rare vintage watch, but for one from the early 2000s that there are many of out there in the world?—doesn’t bother me in the least. It’s one I wear a lot and I’d love it to have it looking brand new.

So… down to personal preference, and some of us have varying preferences even within our own collections. For a 2551.80, I’d pick the watch that looks the best to me and wouldn’t think twice about having it professionally refinished by Omega at service.