originality of this 30t2?

Posts
1,227
Likes
6,299
Thoughts?

12474961b_zoom_v1569325464736.jpg

12474961d_zoom_v1569325467350.jpg



12474961e_zoom_v1569325468676.jpg

12474961g_zoom_v1569325470751.jpg

12474961j_zoom_v1569325475175.jpg

Looks to be a well done redial, possibly done a while ago?

I haven't seen many/any 30t2s from this era with a dial like this, and also with 'swiss' not 'swiss made'
 
Posts
21,734
Likes
49,321
Well, that's incredibly clean, and I haven't seen it before, but I don't see anything obviously wrong with it, except perhaps for the hands being a bit long (or short, in the case of the sub-dial).
Edited:
 
Posts
1,665
Likes
8,765
I would guess a redial as well. I dont like seeing dials this clean when the movement and caseback have clear signs of corrosion. The dials from this era typically didnt hold up as well as the movements...
 
Posts
1,502
Likes
5,696
Looks very much like a high level redial. The dial doesn't fit with the used other parts of the watch
 
Posts
229
Likes
138
Do you think the wear on the indeces are trying to be offputting for it being a redial?
 
Posts
1,665
Likes
8,765
Do you think the wear on the indeces are trying to be offputting for it being a redial?

Or just cheap ink 😁
 
Posts
229
Likes
138
It's ashame because it's a cracking piece. I love these old 30t2 references.