Original tritium lume on a 105.012?

Posts
328
Likes
127
Does original tritium lume on vintage speedmasters become all fluffy and blurry like this ?
Does this mean moisture?
Is the lume on this dial original?
Is it repairable?
Would you keep it as is or replace it?

thanks!
 
Posts
1,430
Likes
2,957
Could you please take more images of the dial including the entire dial... I'm sure the experts on board will appreciate more images.

Offhand, the lume does not look like it has experienced natural patina evolution, but rather, there has being some possible moisture damage to the lume plots.

Whether you leave as is or replace lume all depends on how it looks with the naked eye. I have a speedmaster which is missing some of the lume, but to the naked eye it looks fine in my opinion.
These are both 105.012-66s
Edited:
 
Posts
1,487
Likes
2,376
Looks like water ingress to me. Most of the time I prefer not reluming but if the dial has damage or the lume is gone (or moldy) I think getting the faux lume professionally applied will do wonders for the watch
 
Posts
328
Likes
127
Looks like water ingress to me. Most of the time I prefer not reluming but if the dial has damage or the lume is gone (or moldy) I think getting the faux lume professionally applied will do wonders for the watch
so is that fluffy appearance of the lume (blurred edges) mould on the lume? if it is, how does mold grow on (radioactive) tritium?
Edited:
 
Posts
13,203
Likes
22,963
Well tritium is barely radioactive now if it was new in the 60's.

It's not actually mould anyway. It's just mouldy looking as moisture has degraded and discoloured the lume over the decades.

I always prefer originality but this dial looks like crap so it's one where I'd consider a relume.

What are your thoughts on it @lexieb007?
 
Posts
441
Likes
1,383
Hey,

yep, the dial (and so the lume) has suffered from moisture. The hand of the right subtil shows water damage also.

When moisture gets on the dial, lume acts like a sponge. The lume then darkens more and more, up until its nearly black.

E:
Furthermore, I would not be surprised if the movement is also infected with rust.
If this is a watch that you want to buy, be sure to have the movement shown to you.
 
Posts
328
Likes
127
Well tritium is barely radioactive now if it was new in the 60's.

It's not actually mould anyway. It's just mouldy looking as moisture has degraded and discoloured the lume over the decades.

I always prefer originality but this dial looks like crap so it's one where I'd consider a relume.

What are your thoughts on it @lexieb007?
Well I come to Speedmasters from rolex tritium which never really showed this problem and where the lume stays clear and defined (it just patinas) so that's why I am asking... so many speedmasters of the 60'70s have this tritium lume that is kind of splayed with unclear edges so I wasn't sure if that was the norm for an untouched tritium speedy dial....
 
Posts
13,203
Likes
22,963
Rolex lume certainly does show this kind of ageing.
I think the difference is that a) speedmasters have less water resistance than most oyster cases watches and so are more prone to water contamination, and b) many Rolexes go through dealers hands and are relumed before being seen publicly.
 
Posts
1,487
Likes
2,376
Well I come to Speedmasters from rolex tritium which never really showed this problem and where the lume stays clear and defined (it just patinas) so that's why I am asking... so many speedmasters of the 60'70s have this tritium lume that is kind of splayed with unclear edges so I wasn't sure if that was the norm for an untouched tritium speedy dial....

It’s most prevalent in Seiko’s where I’d guess close to 50% of vintage Seikos have the “funk” on their lume.

I’ve personally never used him but James Hyman has received rave reviews from members here and his relume work would make your dial 1000% better.

https://www.instagram.com/thealchemistrelumer/?hl=en
 
Posts
328
Likes
127
^ relume just doesn't cut it for me.... I don't know... tritium is tritium anyway IMO!
 
Posts
328
Likes
127
How about this lume on the dial and hands. Does this look like genuine original tritium? Not relumed? Thanks
 
Posts
13,203
Likes
22,963
On their own the hour markers look ok but the hands look slightly suspect which makes me question the lot.

One that could go either way and I’d like to see ‘in hand’
 
Posts
295
Likes
387
It would be helpful for the experts (i.e. not me) if you post the photos of the entire dial too.

I agree the hands are questionable as matching hands and dial are always somewhat suspicious on a Speedy.
 
Posts
328
Likes
127
It would be helpful for the experts (i.e. not me) if you post the photos of the entire dial too.

I agree the hands are questionable as matching hands and dial are always somewhat suspicious on a Speedy.
Sure I am finding the originality of tritium hands are impossible to tell via online listings...I know how to tell via UV light and inspection in hand etc...but online is difficult.. it's really hard! They are very much like the hands (shape, colour, lume, flaky paint) on the first watch above....
 
Posts
328
Likes
127
If I post a full dial shot will you all promise not to gazump? 😀
My guess is there are many of us on the same quest that's all 😉 lol
 
Posts
295
Likes
387
If I post a full dial shot will you all promise not to gazump? 😀
My guess is there are many of us on the same quest that's all 😉 lol

If you are buying this on eBay/Craigslist etc. you need to take a punt based on your own assessment. This is the only way you can get somewhat of a bargain these days.
 
Posts
2,293
Likes
4,581
Maybe I'm stating the obvious, but the lume would be the least of my concerns with this watch... its clearly had significant water damage, i'd want to see the movement and get an expert assessment from a watchmaker before proceeding any further.