VetPsychWars
·For various reasons, I believe this to be an original dial, but it's an interesting one.
Easier to see under the loupe, but the printing for "Omega", "Automatic" and "Calendar" is one weight and color and "Seamaster" is another. It looks as though "Seamaster" was printed after "Omega", "Automatic", and "Calendar". I can well believe this.
The minute track vs the shields and arrows are not perfect. I suspect that the first printing was off a bit, because the minute track is off and "Seamaster" seems to align with the shields and arrows better.
The printing is just too good to be a redial, in my opinion, outside of the minute track.
Here's some speculation: this is a US Collection piece, with 11/16" between the lugs. I've seen a few other dials nearly identical to this one. Perhaps Omega sent the rejects out to be used in different countries?
We'll never know. But it makes me wonder.
Tom
Easier to see under the loupe, but the printing for "Omega", "Automatic" and "Calendar" is one weight and color and "Seamaster" is another. It looks as though "Seamaster" was printed after "Omega", "Automatic", and "Calendar". I can well believe this.
The minute track vs the shields and arrows are not perfect. I suspect that the first printing was off a bit, because the minute track is off and "Seamaster" seems to align with the shields and arrows better.
The printing is just too good to be a redial, in my opinion, outside of the minute track.
Here's some speculation: this is a US Collection piece, with 11/16" between the lugs. I've seen a few other dials nearly identical to this one. Perhaps Omega sent the rejects out to be used in different countries?
We'll never know. But it makes me wonder.
Tom





