Original crown?

Posts
77
Likes
33
Does this crown belong to a cal. 268 watch?馃え
 
Posts
5,636
Likes
5,792
Perhaps not, but it has nothing to do with the caliber, but the reference! What's the reference/case number inside the case back?
 
Posts
77
Likes
33
Perhaps not, but it has nothing to do with the caliber, but the reference! What's the reference/case number inside the case back?
It's 14389-12-CSP
 
Posts
77
Likes
33
Perhaps not, but it has nothing to do with the caliber, but the reference! What's the reference/case number inside the case back?
Can you tell me is that even a genuine Omega crown?
 
Posts
77
Likes
33
Maybe? Matches one I saw online.
Okay. I'm curious cos I'm a newbie and also cos I have never seen one like this. But good to hear!
 
Posts
435
Likes
1,378
Hey 馃榾

although iam not into this model, the crown itself looks right for this model. The only thing iam not sure about is the omega logo (should be a flat foot logo afaik).
 
Posts
559
Likes
587
It's 14389-12-CSP

It definitely looks right. After looking up the model on an old list, it seems like the correct crown would be a Ref 45003. From what I understand, Omega changed the parts ref # system a little while ago, so there likely is a new number that may not come up when this reference is searched.

But, after a quick google search, I found this link:

https://www.chrono24.com/omega/crow...5003-unseal-packed-crown--id13592050.htm#gref

Looks to me like the same crown, but in yellow gold. Looks like "069sx45003" is the new reference number for a yellow gold plates crown and I read that the letter combination corresponds to the type of metal, but hopefully somebody more experienced than me can chime in and confirm.
 
Posts
559
Likes
587
One caveat to my comment above is that this watch may have come with a different crown when it was first produced. Oftentimes, Omega eventually stops producing the original style crowns and replaces them with a correct modern alternative. Over the years, a watchmaker may have changed it with the updated crown to maintain watertightness. I've seen this on some of the 60's Connies and seamasters.
 
Posts
77
Likes
33
One caveat to my comment above is that this watch may have come with a different crown when it was first produced. Oftentimes, Omega eventually stops producing the original style crowns and replaces them with a correct modern alternative. Over the years, a watchmaker may have changed it with the updated crown to maintain watertightness. I've seen this on some of the 60's Connies and seamasters.
Thanks for telling me all this! Actually you guessed right: the owner of this watch has replaced the original crown with this one since the first one got lost. Happy hear that tha one is "correct" for this ref. tho 馃榾
 
Posts
4
Likes
2
It definitely looks right. After looking up the model on an old list, it seems like the correct crown would be a Ref 45003. From what I understand, Omega changed the parts ref # system a little while ago, so there likely is a new number that may not come up when this reference is searched.

But, after a quick google search, I found this link:

https://www.chrono24.com/omega/crow...5003-unseal-packed-crown--id13592050.htm#gref

Looks to me like the same crown, but in yellow gold. Looks like "069sx45003" is the new reference number for a yellow gold plates crown and I read that the letter combination corresponds to the type of metal, but hopefully somebody more experienced than me can chime in and confirm.

Can you tell us the list relating ref number and crown reference?
 
Posts
559
Likes
587
Fantastic piece of information! Thanks a lot!!!
Happy to help! Just by searching around you can find a treasure trove of info in this forum.