- Posts
- 4,964
- Likes
- 18,427
Opinion on a 165.024?
- Posts
- 4,964
- Likes
- 18,427
Shabbaz
·No stubbies, serifs are ok, baton hands match, patina is even, lume bezel on number and hour markers...
- Posts
- 4,964
- Likes
- 18,427
Shabbaz
·Ref nr 22xx 1965
- Posts
- 946
- Likes
- 2,077
Vintagewtchzilla
·on a first look at those bad pics it looks generally ok but the bleeding lume is something i couldn't live with
needs def more and better pics ...
needs def more and better pics ...
- Posts
- 21,855
- Likes
- 49,582
Dan S
·I'm not seeing any obvious red flags, but the lume on the dial is not attractive.
[Edit: Zilla beat me to it.]
[Edit: Zilla beat me to it.]
- Posts
- 4,964
- Likes
- 18,427
- Posts
- 946
- Likes
- 2,077
- Posts
- 2,306
- Likes
- 5,643
ndgal
·#1 Rule in buying Vintage watches:
It is always better to pay more for a stellar example, than get a “deal” on a mediocre one.
It is always better to pay more for a stellar example, than get a “deal” on a mediocre one.
Edited:
- Posts
- 1,372
- Likes
- 1,998
connieseamaster
·I don't see "T Swiss Made T" on the dial
- Posts
- 21,855
- Likes
- 49,582
Dan S
·I don't see "T Swiss Made T" on the dial
The rehaut is obscuring the bottom of the dial, so it's impossible to know if it's there.
- Posts
- 1,853
- Likes
- 3,591
Dash1
·The lume looks awful to me. At that price you definitely need better pics from the seller.
