On the new no-date Seamasters: pricing?

Posts
1,894
Likes
2,888
Take the new black one vs. the Bond 60th. Essentially the same watch but in a different color. The new one is 6500 USD; the Bond is 8300.

I get that the Bond is a LE and has the caseback “animation” (that some would see as silly and gimmicky but others like), and that it has the “60” bezel.

Does that stuff alone justify an $1800 price differential?

Do we assume that Omega will not release a blue color variant for the new watch in order to avoid heightening the absurdity of this price disparity?

I’m glad that Omega didn’t price the new Seamasters at 8k. But I do feel like the Bond’s pricing is now quite bizarre. Unless you really care about the movie branding..?
 
Posts
342
Likes
291
Take the new black one vs. the Bond 60th. Essentially the same watch but in a different color. The new one is 6500 USD; the Bond is 8300.

I get that the Bond is a LE and has the caseback “animation” (that some would see as silly and gimmicky but others like), and that it has the “60” bezel.

Does that stuff alone justify an $1800 price differential?

Do we assume that Omega will not release a blue color variant for the new watch in order to avoid heightening the absurdity of this price disparity?

I’m glad that Omega didn’t price the new Seamasters at 8k. But I do feel like the Bond’s pricing is now quite bizarre. Unless you really care about the movie branding..?
Licensing in a nutshell, Bond watches have always been a few thousand more than regular pricing.
 
Posts
10,662
Likes
16,632
Perhaps a better question might be why is the new no date $800 or whatever more than the existing standard model when that has ceramic dial, bezel and a fully functioning bracelet. We were told that Aluminium inserts were old hat and prices were raised when the new super tough bezel material was rolled out. Now it seems aluminium is another step forward? Err.

The real answer is they charge what they can get away with. Always have.
Edited:
 
Posts
141
Likes
406
Well they could probably say they had to painstakingly add lume to the bezel…😅
Recent trend seems to be ceramic/pip lume or aluminium/full lume.
 
Posts
646
Likes
314
Those new releases like when you meet a friend after long years and you see him same as before, but with new hair trim. looool
 
Posts
2,074
Likes
4,231
Perhaps a better question might be why is the new no date $800 or whatever more than the existing standard model when that has ceramic bezel dial, bezel and a fully functioning bracelet. We were told that Aluminium inserts were old hat and prices were raised when the new super tough bezel material was rolled out. Now it seems aluminium is another step forward? Err.

The real answer is they charge what they can get away with. Always have.
Agreed. They should be cheaper since they are "lesser".
 
Posts
722
Likes
2,048
Those new releases like when you meet a friend after long years and you see him same as before, but with new hair trim. looool
But a little chunkier around the midsection and wearing a belt which just doesn't fit quite right 🤣
 
Posts
2,202
Likes
10,121
Agreed. They should be cheaper since they are "lesser".
This is what I said on another thread about 5 minutes after release. More money for less content in a parts bin watch.
 
Posts
161
Likes
151
Honestly, I think Omega is trying to capitalize on the buyer who has just given up on buying a Rolex.

The Submariner ND is over $9K, so anything $8 or less is considered a bargain.

As far as the Bond 60th SMD premium price compared with the new ND, someone has to pay the Bond franchising fee.