Community Stories

Omega “Cosmic” Triple Date Moonphase

kaisiang098
Posts
310
Likes
901
Good day to all!

Recently I’ve been itching for solid gold pieces and I came across this little number.
143F61AF-9F82-4510-9F16-16AC36BF81F8.png 7ED8518D-6FF3-44B3-8686-7BBD32206DBD.jpeg 076A6CD3-A5AE-4EE7-B2B6-AB57BADDE71E.jpeg 4F8FB7AE-7350-439D-9D8A-3F620EC06FEF.jpeg

A solid gold Omega triple date moon phase. (Sorry if the photos aren’t that great, the lighting was no where ideal🙁)
I’ve been reading up on the older threads regarding them and it seems the font is if correct with the flat top ‘A’ and the date colours does match the colour of the date hands.
That being said, I’m still a young Padawan and would love to have the masters chime in on this.

Here’s some case and movement shots
8D4FFFE9-AD00-4384-94AA-C34278CEA203.jpeg D7B813C0-8F1F-4109-AFBA-4E6CEAACE6A4.jpeg


Thank you!
Edited:
 
Skier
Posts
53
Likes
137
Lovely and far better on the leather than that bracelet IMHO. I'm looking for a gold one with a black dial and English day/month wheels. I don't really know why as they're tiny by modern standards and I know that about 42mm to 45mm is the range for me.
 
Speedmasterfan88
Posts
1,303
Likes
4,386
Over all it looks like an attractive watch. But I‘ve seen so many repainted TDMP dials that I get super carefull about them when I see one.
The minute track on this one looks okay and consistent.

But the Fonds of the date numbers are inconsistent in my opinion.

Compare the number 2 through out the dial, especially the angle of the opening on the bottom of the 2. also the number 7 seems to be inconsistent.

This may as well be caused by distortion of the crystal. Hard to tell without having the watch in hand.

I‘m not an expert on TDMP‘s by any means, but this is something I would give a closer look.

Also the Fond of the Date seems to be thicker than the Month on the date Wheels. I don’t know if this was intentional with this model.

Hopefully some real experts chime in.

Cheers,

Max
 
Interstellar
Posts
298
Likes
132
Agree with Speedmasterfan88. I think the outer date numbers have been redone. Another telltale sign is the number 8.Varies across.
 
kaisiang098
Posts
310
Likes
901
Speedmasterfan88 Speedmasterfan88
Over all it looks like an attractive watch. But I‘ve seen so many repainted TDMP dials that I get super carefull about them when I see one.

Exactly! Which is why im being extra cautious around them. Thanks for your input Max!
 
merchandiser
Posts
594
Likes
2,120
I have a TDMP with the same dial, your example looks correct to me. Here’s mine:

D0B67A3F-0B2B-4A68-83E4-DF20CD4303A4.jpeg
Edited:
 
Speedmasterfan88
Posts
1,303
Likes
4,386
merchandiser merchandiser
I have TDMP with the same dial, your example looks correct to me. Here’s mine:

D0B67A3F-0B2B-4A68-83E4-DF20CD4303A4.jpeg


Nice watch!

As I said, without having the watch in hand, or the seller providing a picture with the crystal removed, it's hard to say if it's just distortion from the crystal edges/ angle or if it's realy inconsistancys in the print.

I have to say that on your example the Fond looks thinner and more refined as on the OP's watch. Especially on the Day and Month Datewheels.
Also take a look at how crisp the edges of your Datewindows are, on the OP's watch they look way less refined.

Another difference is the crosshair. Yours is touching with the lower edges of the Moonphase Window, while the OP's watch isn't.

I'm still going with redial on the OP watch.

Cheers,

Max
 
optsdan
Posts
152
Likes
257
Looks stunning on the leather! I’ll leave the experts to comment on the dial.
 
kaisiang098
Posts
310
Likes
901
merchandiser merchandiser
I have TDMP with the same dial, your example looks correct to me. Here’s mine:

D0B67A3F-0B2B-4A68-83E4-DF20CD4303A4.jpeg

Nice piece you have there!
It does look identical especially to the fourth photo.
 
kaisiang098
Posts
310
Likes
901
Speedmasterfan88 Speedmasterfan88
I have to say that on your example the Fond looks thinner and more refined as on the OP's watch.

Hmm yes this I do agree.
Btw it’s not my watch, i wouldn’t buy something that I have doubts about haha. So the proper term will be “watch OP posted” 😁
 
Speedmasterfan88
Posts
1,303
Likes
4,386
kaisiang098 kaisiang098
Hmm yes this I do agree.
Btw it’s not my watch, i wouldn’t buy something that I have doubts about haha. So the proper term will be “watch OP posted” 😁


Oh I thought that would be clear 😉.
 
Sign up or log in to reply...

Similar threads

T

New Purchase: Omega Cosmic Triple Date Moonphase (2471)

troyjames1987 Vintage Omega Watches Help, Discussion and Advice
T
troyjames1987
Posts
0
Views
2K
C

Triple date moonphase question

CMP930 Vintage Omega Watches Help, Discussion and Advice
lonegunm4n
lonegunm4n
Posts
5
Views
2K
kyle L

Vintage 1940s Omega Cosmic Triple Date Moonphase 2471

kyle L Watches For Sale
kyle L
kyle L
Posts
5
Views
7K
seekingseaquest

Vintage Near-NOS Keystone Triple Date Moonphase w/ an Oversize Steel Case

seekingseaquest Private Watch Sales
seekingseaquest
seekingseaquest
Posts
19
Views
16K
DirtyDozen12

Universal Geneve triple-date moonphase at Sotheby's

DirtyDozen12 Universal Genève Watches
Mark020
Mark020
Posts
17
Views
3K
OmegaMale

Grandpa’s Omega Cosmic Triple Date Moonphase

OmegaMale Vintage Omega Watches Help, Discussion and Advice
cristos71
cristos71
Posts
27
Views
11K