mr_yossarian
·I rejected Speedmaster’s with both Soleil dials and one with a concentric numbered sub-dial for that exact reason. Uncommon and unconfirmed, I should have been braver!
Please consider donating to help offset our high running costs.
I rejected Speedmaster’s with both Soleil dials and one with a concentric numbered sub-dial for that exact reason. Uncommon and unconfirmed, I should have been braver!
The point is, a huge amount of investigation and effort has already been put in for MWO and no one has found any evidence that a non Pro dial was found in a Pro case.
As I said previously, I don't think the 'parts bin' argument can be used here as the Pro dial and asymmetric case go hand in hand together so I can't imagine Omega would have been lax with this.
I clicked the link and got this as a message...
Anyone want to download the photo (and viruses) for me so I don’t have to follow the link?
paranoid
..furthermore, the "pro" version was a USP for a more modern, advanced design. Why would Omega allow to have these confused with the previous version.