Omega Speedmaster 321 Ed White: Wrist Shots Wanted

Posts
76
Likes
118
Doesn’t the hesalite technically sit even lower than the sapphire as a result of the metallic caseback instead of the glass caseback? I know I can poly the hesalite but I dunno if I’ll find the micro abrasions annoying and find myself doing that all the time. I’ve only seen the sapphire and hesalite indoors, they probably behave quite differently outdoors. I noticed I couldn’t see the hesalite from the driving wheel angle we’ve been discussing, looks blurry.
Hesalite & sapphires sit on my wrist exactly the same in terms of the caseback being glass vs. closed. The difference of thickness comes from whether the front glass is domed or flattish. Both sit equally well for me, but sapphire looks flat. 321 EW definitely feels taller than hesalite, I think it's combination of 0.2mm more thickness and smaller diameter.
 
Posts
76
Likes
118
Doesn’t the hesalite technically sit even lower than the sapphire as a result of the metallic caseback instead of the glass caseback? I know I can poly the hesalite but I dunno if I’ll find the micro abrasions annoying and find myself doing that all the time. I’ve only seen the sapphire and hesalite indoors, they probably behave quite differently outdoors. I noticed I couldn’t see the hesalite from the driving wheel angle we’ve been discussing, looks blurry.
Polywatch - you can very easily erase scratches.
 
Posts
78
Likes
19
Hesalite & sapphires sit on my wrist exactly the same in terms of the caseback being glass vs. closed. The difference of thickness comes from whether the front glass is domed or flattish. Both sit equally well for me, but sapphire looks flat. 321 EW definitely feels taller than hesalite, I think it's combination of 0.2mm more thickness and smaller diameter.
Interesting, because my spouse thought the White dial speedy looked bulkier. To be fair, the white speedy was on the OEM bracelet which isn't sized and the black hesalite speedy I tried was on the OEM black sail.
 
Posts
76
Likes
118
The hesalite and sapphire ones I have got black dial. The darker the look, it generally looks smaller, I think. I chose black dial over white dial when making the purchase decision for that reason, thanks!
 
Posts
78
Likes
19
The hesalite and sapphire ones I have got black dial. The darker the look, it generally looks smaller, I think. I chose black dial over white dial when making the purchase decision for that reason, thanks!
Why did you choose both? The 3861 Hesalite and 3861 Sapphire black dials
 
Posts
61
Likes
172
Doesn’t the hesalite technically sit even lower than the sapphire as a result of the metallic caseback instead of the glass caseback? I know I can poly the hesalite but I dunno if I’ll find the micro abrasions annoying and find myself doing that all the time. I’ve only seen the sapphire and hesalite indoors, they probably behave quite differently outdoors. I noticed I couldn’t see the hesalite from the driving wheel angle we’ve been discussing, looks blurry.
Personally I've put a Spiralwinder sapphire caseback on my Hesalite 3861 to make it sit even lower than the original metal caseback. Hesalite crystal is not as easily scratched as you might think, and the occasional 5-minute polishing actually bonds you with the watch even more.
 
Posts
76
Likes
118
Why did you choose both? The 3861 Hesalite and 3861 Sapphire black dials
Sorry I was not clear enough. I bought hesalite 3861 about 9months ago. Last month, I bought sapphire 3861 but it's sedna gold-steel bi-color model, thanks.
 
Posts
13
Likes
32
Dang, I wish the Ed White was in my budget. It's a beauty. I wish my local boutique had one, so I could see it in person.
 
Posts
187
Likes
418
This is some next level rumination. Just buy the watch.
Some people see a dangerous cliff; others a fun place to base jump.
 
Posts
76
Likes
118
Why did you choose both? The 3861 Hesalite and 3861 Sapphire black dials
Hello,

I just read all comments under this thread now. Hope this helps your selection.

I have 16.5cm wrist circumference and am 172cm tall.

3861 hesalite: 47.5 LtL, 13.54 thick
3861 sapphire: 47.5 LtL, 13.18 thick
New fois: 48 LtL, 13.38 thick
321 EW: 48 LtL, 13.7 thick

I have 3861 hesalite, 3861 sapphire sedna gold two tone and 321 EW. I have not even tried new FOIS on wrist.

My wearing experience & how I feel:
- 3861s: both sit very well on wrist. I don't feel the difference in thickness, probably because their steel case dimensions are exaclty the same but only the glass shape different- flat or domed, hence the 0.36mm gap. I feel them exactly same, when speaking of size 'only' (including thickness) on my wrist.

- 3861 vs 321: Now, it's tricky part for me. 321 feels more like a hocky puck. I feel like I am wearing 'something' in a not very good sense compared to 3861. I am not saying it does not wear well - it's only relative to 3861, and it's an evidence how genius the design logic is for 3861 despite its seemingly not pleasant size and dimensions. I think it comes from a combination of a few things - longer LtL, thickness and bracelet. Comparing the two different steel bracelet, I think 321 is better in terms of aesthetics and how it hugs the wrist, but that very chracteristics make it support less well the watch's case when it's longer and taller than 3861 case, and makes the case & head of 321 EW move more on the wrist. LtL, thickness & the softness of bracelet - each one when taken into consideration individually, does not make a big difference, but all combined, it makes a difference to me. I read comments here by other users saying no difference, so I again believe how it wears and feels are all very relative.

So what I did to 321 EW? I bought an original Omega black alligator strap a few months ago, but only felt it made the wearing experience worse, because the leather won't sit tight on my wrist so it makes 321 EW even taller on my wrist. Also, from aesthetics, it's strange to say, but it is less beautiful than seen on others or from pictures. So I recently came back to the original steel bracelet.

Lastly, here you go with pictures of my 3 speedmasters. The one with a black cushion is 321 EW.

 
Posts
78
Likes
19
Hello,

I just read all comments under this thread now. Hope this helps your selection.

I have 16.5cm wrist circumference and am 172cm tall.

3861 hesalite: 47.5 LtL, 13.54 thick
3861 sapphire: 47.5 LtL, 13.18 thick
New fois: 48 LtL, 13.38 thick
321 EW: 48 LtL, 13.7 thick

I have 3861 hesalite, 3861 sapphire sedna gold two tone and 321 EW. I have not even tried new FOIS on wrist.

My wearing experience & how I feel:
- 3861s: both sit very well on wrist. I don't feel the difference in thickness, probably because their steel case dimensions are exaclty the same but only the glass shape different- flat or domed, hence the 0.36mm gap. I feel them exactly same, when speaking of size 'only' (including thickness) on my wrist.

- 3861 vs 321: Now, it's tricky part for me. 321 feels more like a hocky puck. I feel like I am wearing 'something' in a not very good sense compared to 3861. I am not saying it does not wear well - it's only relative to 3861, and it's an evidence how genius the design logic is for 3861 despite its seemingly not pleasant size and dimensions. I think it comes from a combination of a few things - longer LtL, thickness and bracelet. Comparing the two different steel bracelet, I think 321 is better in terms of aesthetics and how it hugs the wrist, but that very chracteristics make it support less well the watch's case when it's longer and taller than 3861 case, and makes the case & head of 321 EW move more on the wrist. LtL, thickness & the softness of bracelet - each one when taken into consideration individually, does not make a big difference, but all combined, it makes a difference to me. I read comments here by other users saying no difference, so I again believe how it wears and feels are all very relative.

So what I did to 321 EW? I bought an original Omega black alligator strap a few months ago, but only felt it made the wearing experience worse, because the leather won't sit tight on my wrist so it makes 321 EW even taller on my wrist. Also, from aesthetics, it's strange to say, but it is less beautiful than seen on others or from pictures. So I recently came back to the original steel bracelet.

Lastly, here you go with pictures of my 3 speedmasters. The one with a black cushion is 321 EW.

Very helpful. The FOIS to me felt like a hockey puck and I typically don’t enjoy that feel. I wear my watches loose, so any instability is always exacerbated.

Slightly changing subjects but I wonder how the 50th Silver Snoopy will feel - it’s thicker than the normal 3861, but that 3861 is so well designed that it still might seem slick.
 
Posts
76
Likes
118
Very helpful. The FOIS to me felt like a hockey puck and I typically don’t enjoy that feel. I wear my watches loose, so any instability is always exacerbated.

Slightly changing subjects but I wonder how the 50th Silver Snoopy will feel - it’s thicker than the normal 3861, but that 3861 is so well designed that it still might seem slick.
I just hanged 321 EW from alligator leather to its steel bracelet yesterday and adjusted the size tighter to my wrist than when I initially purchased. It's okay now i e the case / head of the watch won't move around as I move my hand, which is very satisfying. It still seems a bit taller than 3861s, but I now realize how well the bracelet could hold tight / support the watch case is more relevant to how I feel wearing a watch. My satisfaction level of this NEW 321 suddenly is shooting up....