Omega Speedmaster 105.012...

ext1 · Feb 25, 2019

JimJupiter
No, like I said: 20.522.160 😀

Thanks for the clarification! Huh, then that's pretty odd.
So we know that:
205204xx 105.012-63 Record unavailable
205206xx 105.002-62 Record unavailable
20520861 105.012-63 Record available
20522160 105.003-63 Record unavailable
Odd!

JimJupiter · Feb 25, 2019

The guys of the Museum are aware of it. Some microfilms are damaged or destroyed, so you can see some information, but not all to made an extract out of it.

ext1 · Feb 25, 2019

I guess so. I was honestly disappointed that they didn't even tell me where it was delivered to at what date, because I read that most people do at least get that even if they cannot get their ref confirmed. Oh well...

Stuie · Feb 25, 2019

Just to be clear the information i managed to find out about my watch didn't come direct from Omega.
"Regarding your 105.012-63. There is no production archive as these were assembled at Lemania.
We looked in the delivery books and found this mvt number was delivered to United Kingdom on March 9, 1964.
However, there is no reference number confirmed on this one and that is why they can’t complete an archive extract."
I purchased a 145.022-71 from the Davidoff Brothers and it is them that have a very good relationship with the Omega museam.
During the dialogue around this watch and its extract I mentioned that I was unable to get any info on my -63.
As they were visiting the museam they did me a favour and were able to search for my serial in Omegas records and provide the details above 😀

Om3ga321 · Feb 25, 2019

The 'T's were added by Omega at a later date.Asymmetrical T dial for a 63 is documented in MWO.
My 63 matches yours exactly and I could not get an extract as well.Serial 20 520 9XX

DB1983 · Mar 12, 2019

S Stuie
Just to be clear the information i managed to find out about my watch didn't come direct from Omega.
"Regarding your 105.012-63. There is no production archive as these were assembled at Lemania.
We looked in the delivery books and found this mvt number was delivered to United Kingdom on March 9, 1964.
However, there is no reference number confirmed on this one and that is why they can’t complete an archive extract."
I purchased a 145.022-71 from the Davidoff Brothers and it is them that have a very good relationship with the Omega museam.
During the dialogue around this watch and its extract I mentioned that I was unable to get any info on my -63.
As they were visiting the museam they did me a favour and were able to search for my serial in Omegas records and provide the details above 😀

Happy to help!!

DogmaT · Apr 10, 2019

Hello Everyone,

I am a newcomer but have been searching for a while for a vintage speedmaster.
Recently I found below 105.012, from '64 to '66 I presume based on its characteristics: DON, close T Swiss T. Although bezel and dial somewhat damaged over the years.
But what about the hands and the movement?
Your insights are really appreciated!

Oscarman · Apr 10, 2019

I would not have any kind of issues wearing it. It looks good. The mechanism does not show any traces of rust and/or water damage. The hands match the face and bezel. I do not see anything wrong with it. Maybe some of the other, more experienced Speedmasters lovers in the forum can give you a greater insight.

Omega Speedmaster 105.012...

ext1

JimJupiter

ext1

Stuie

Om3ga321

DB1983

DogmaT

Oscarman

Similar threads

INCOMING SPEEDMASTER 105.012-64

Seeking advice on this Speedmaster 105.012-66

Omega Speedmaster 105.012-64/65 with production year 1966!

Thoughts on this Speedmaster 105.012-65 please

Omega Speedmaster 105.012-66 HF on an auction (in a bad shape)!

Omega Speedmaster 105.012-66 CB 321 Pre-Moon - Price drop again