Omega SMP300 2531.80 Dial Authentication

Posts
10,796
Likes
16,805
Fair enough, lesson learned! I thought the online checkers were accurate for older models such as these.

What is the range for the 2541.80 out of curiosity, do you know? Perhaps I have the year wrong on my own watch as well, it's a 5769XXXX.
I would estimate that serial for a quartz SMP at 1998-9 production but that is with less confidence than for the autos as I have less data to work with.
 
Posts
217
Likes
109
I’m just comparing my 2531.80 to the OP’s and I think there are additional concerns that haven’t been raised.
Firstly, apart from the appalling print quality, the dial is wrong. The hour markers are much too large.
Secondly, the mid-case is incorrect. Look at the shape of the crown guards, specifically the shape of the inner part that encloses the crown. On a genuine 2531.80 these are straight and extend right under the edge of the bezel - in other words, when looking straight on there is nothing between the base of the crown and the edge of the bezel. Unscrew the crown and there’s just daylight beyond the bezel edge. On the OP’s case the inner part of the crown guards is curved and part of the case extends beyond the bezel edge. The underside (back) of the crown guard area is also totally wrong.
Years ago I have seen and handled one of the more accurate replicas of the 2254.50 (same case) and noted this characteristic. Actually this part of the replica case (crown guards) resembled the GMT Seamaster case. I concluded that the reason for it was that the replica was made to utilise an ETA 2824 or equivalent, which is thicker than a 2892/1120 and therefore the stem sits further down.
The OP’s caseback is, in my opinion, a fake. Hard to tell from the photos but I suspect not as flat as it ought to be. Again to accommodate a 2824. Every detail is crude in comparison to the genuine article and the holes for the removal tool slightly too far from the wave pattern.
I would also doubt that the crown itself is genuine - it lacks the definition it should have.
IMO only the movement is genuine. Everything else is fake.
If it could be confirmed that this serial number belongs to a 2531.80 it would make me think there’s another genuine watch bearing this number, now with a 2892 movement inside. Any chance that this one passed EBay’s authenticity checks on the strength of the movement while some chancer is enjoying the proper watch only with a 2892??
A few quick photos around the CG area of mine under artificial light. I could try for something better in daylight tomorrow.

Edited:
 
Posts
1,429
Likes
1,452
Archer has confirmed that this serial number belongs to a 2531.80. Makes me think there’s another genuine watch bearing this number and now with a 2892 movement inside.
Has he? I don't see a post from Archer in this thread.
 
Posts
217
Likes
109
Has he? I don't see a post from Archer in this thread.
Sorry, my mistake. That was a linked thread. I will edit my post.
 
Posts
93
Likes
423
Hey folks! Thank you so much for all the intel from this post. Archer did check the serial, and the movement is for the correct model. I sent the seller this post, and he agreed to refund me. Thank you so much for your input! One more point to add: the bezel has a little bit more play than usual. So I would agree that there is a chance that this whole watch is fake, with a real movement and cards! That's scary to think of!
 
Posts
770
Likes
1,792
Hey folks! Thank you so much for all the intel from this post. Archer did check the serial, and the movement is for the correct model. I sent the seller this post, and he agreed to refund me. Thank you so much for your input! One more point to add: the bezel has a little bit more play than usual. So I would agree that there is a chance that this whole watch is fake, with a real movement and cards! That's scary to think of!

Good outcome! How strange.

Did the case have the correct serial number on the lug? I would expect if it was completely fake it would not have the serial number matching the genuine movement. If someone has gone to the length to fake the serial number to match a real movement, that's pretty unusual for a rep.

It used to be common for reps to all have the same serial number. The counterfeiters would just copy the serial number markings from the genuine watch they used to design the replica, and then apply it to all of them. There are plenty of replicas which have incremental serials too, but it would be highly unusual for a replica to have a serial number that matched a genuine sourced movement. Most reps will not have genuine movements in them, that's fairly rarely done by owners with second hand movements post purchase.

One more point to add: the bezel has a little bit more play than usual.

Sounds like an improvement, haha. The bezel on the real ones is a bit hard to use. 😜
 
Posts
4,130
Likes
8,846
Did the case have the correct serial number on the lug?

Curious of this as well, sounds like a pretty good outcome. To @TomGW 's point about the case I wonder if it is possible that a completely fake bezel and insert could result in the visible mid case he noted.
 
Posts
1,429
Likes
1,452
I am so glad I'm happy with the watches I have. I'm tired of the fake stuff out there. It's a minefield.

Now I just need to sell the watches I'm not keeping. A process that I hate...
Edited:
 
Posts
93
Likes
423
Good outcome! How strange.

Did the case have the correct serial number on the lug? I would expect if it was completely fake it would not have the serial number matching the genuine movement. If someone has gone to the length to fake the serial number to match a real movement, that's pretty unusual for a rep.

It used to be common for reps to all have the same serial number. The counterfeiters would just copy the serial number markings from the genuine watch they used to design the replica, and then apply it to all of them. There are plenty of replicas which have incremental serials too, but it would be highly unusual for a replica to have a serial number that matched a genuine sourced movement. Most reps will not have genuine movements in them, that's fairly rarely done by owners with second hand movements post purchase.



Sounds like an improvement, haha. The bezel on the real ones is a bit hard to use. 😜
Sorry for the late reply. I no longer have the watch to take a pic, but as far as I remember, the serial number on the caseback matched the movement. So it is a pretty weird situation. I would assume this is an attempt to build a franken and pass it off as genuine.
 
Posts
217
Likes
109
To the OP. A full refund is a good outcome for you. The scary thing is, if a genuine, used dial had been used you would not have had any suspicions at all and that is apparent to anyone reading through this thread. Genuine dials do crop up on eBay and is an obvious next step’ for an unscrupulous seller.
Can I suggest that you amend the title of this thread to include the movement reference? That way it will be easier for any future buyer/potential buyer to be alerted. After all, this was the full package with box and cards bearing the correct reference for a 2351.80.

For example:
https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/377592632481?_skw=2531.80+dial&itmmeta=01M5PR8EFY37Q9YP01YXE1XQ41&hash=item57ea4654a1:g:K1MAAeSwUGRq2hgi&itmprp=enc:AQALAAAA8CHNgUiiE/jQhlDTaMiAde8OMppsdUGcw44CjJuiGihF19q5GMoxl3PQmquwAsf98jGjjFOC7kwprzaoJGbx1dVk7z7zHRgqIIlqGAe/5aPeBt0XX9YHmEbJFctmWq2eh07iKKsbuePQp6komFNLCdnosQa6MT13mnaomHuO/mZwBkDIygrzSLhXKi1xYj6Jh1ap8qHo7Bx5bYGLooENbO+cl1QTZqEuRl29qLUORiC/kFYOAOMby1j5m/pDv2vOBFsxsYIH9zZeApXuuiGUdC4TRUBRdKLrZVBXQ9mTcAqS/1U8M8y6FWyWuAXPEtOnLA==|tkp:Bk9SR6DooditaA

Not the best photos but appears to be genuine. Not perfect but a huge improvement on what was originally used.
Edited:
 
This website may earn commission from Ebay sales.
Posts
1,472
Likes
6,545
I've seen and handled Indian produced fake Gen 1 dials. Well certainly repainted and passed off as original. They are out there and this could be one for all I know.
Anyone with hobby interest in Lee Enfield service rifles knows the reputation of Khyber Pass rifles. (In short you wouldn't want to have the thing snuggled up to any of your body parts when squeezing the trigger.) They might be okay, they might look okay to a blind man on a galloping horse....
 
Posts
93
Likes
423
To the OP. A full refund is a good outcome for you. The scary thing is, if a genuine, used dial had been used you would not have had any suspicions at all and that is apparent to anyone reading through this thread. Genuine dials do crop up on eBay and is an obvious next step’ for an unscrupulous seller.
Can I suggest that you amend the title of this thread to include the movement reference? That way it will be easier for any future buyer/potential buyer to be alerted. After all, this was the full package with box and cards bearing the correct reference for a 2351.80.

For example:
https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/377592632481?_skw=2531.80+dial&itmmeta=01M5PR8EFY37Q9YP01YXE1XQ41&hash=item57ea4654a1:g:K1MAAeSwUGRq2hgi&itmprp=enc:AQALAAAA8CHNgUiiE/jQhlDTaMiAde8OMppsdUGcw44CjJuiGihF19q5GMoxl3PQmquwAsf98jGjjFOC7kwprzaoJGbx1dVk7z7zHRgqIIlqGAe/5aPeBt0XX9YHmEbJFctmWq2eh07iKKsbuePQp6komFNLCdnosQa6MT13mnaomHuO/mZwBkDIygrzSLhXKi1xYj6Jh1ap8qHo7Bx5bYGLooENbO+cl1QTZqEuRl29qLUORiC/kFYOAOMby1j5m/pDv2vOBFsxsYIH9zZeApXuuiGUdC4TRUBRdKLrZVBXQ9mTcAqS/1U8M8y6FWyWuAXPEtOnLA==|tkp:Bk9SR6DooditaA

Not the best photos but appears to be genuine. Not perfect but a huge improvement on what was originally used.
Good idea and I have just updated it
 
This website may earn commission from Ebay sales.