Omega SM300 Military - Advice on Authenticity

Posts
1,849
Likes
3,575
M MrMatt
Got this back yesterday 馃榾. Very pleased with the result!
Wow - it actually says 'Delivered to the British Military'. I thought the extracts for these only showed they were delivered to the United Kingdom as the Military Seamasters were sent to Goldsmiths first (the UK importer for Omega) and were ordered from Goldsmiths by the Military.
 
Posts
1,794
Likes
2,548
Dash1 Ash
Wow - it actually says 'Delivered to the British Military'. I thought the extracts for these only showed they were delivered to the United Kingdom as the Military Seamasters were sent to Goldsmiths first (the UK importer for Omega) and were ordered from Goldsmiths by the Military.
Recent change of policy apparently Ash.
 
Posts
1,849
Likes
3,575
Recent change of policy apparently Ash.
Interesting, but does the Omega archive actually have the information on the final destination?
Edited:
 
Posts
6
Likes
22
Dash1 Ash
Interesting, but does the Onega archive actually have the information on the final destination?

There was no other information provided other than a covering letter (and a fancy wax sealed wallet!) - it is probably worth asking the question. Has anybody had any luck with this before?

Does anybody know how many of the military version were produced, I cannot seem to find this information anywhere. Can anybody give me a pointer?
 
Posts
216
Likes
100
Slap a burnt orange nato on that and it will look stunning.
 
Posts
124
Likes
2,122
M MrMatt
Hi All,

I have the opportunity to buy an Omega SM300 Military (see pictures), but am looking for a second opinion on how correct the watch actually is.

Apparently bought in the late 80s from a dealer, it has a modern Omega Service case and there are 2 sets of glasses and crowns with it which have been replaced, presumably during a service. Which I have been told has been carried out by Omega, but there is nothing proving so.

There is nothing I feel is obviously wrong with it (but could stand to be corrected) with the exception of the dial/hand configuration, in particular given the difference in patina.

The movement is within 2 years of the case, which dates to 1968/1970 respectively, however as I understand it, the baton hands were used in earlier models which this certainly isn't. So does anybody know if this config exists anywhere in the military versions, are these replacement hands or is the whole hand/dial set up wrong for the year?

Any help would be appreciated.
 
Posts
13
Likes
3
How do you get this certificate? Also what did you pay for this out of internet, pm me if you don't want to disclose.
 
Posts
3,719
Likes
4,200
I've seen pictures of these without the "T" on the dial - on MWR, are these legit?

IMAG0152_zps39fa1be3.jpg
 
Posts
1,794
Likes
2,548
I've seen pictures of these without the "T" on the dial - on MWR, are these legit?
They can be legit, but are less desirable.
 
Posts
2,193
Likes
7,260
M MrMatt
The price was such that I couldn't walk away, and its now on my wrist 馃榾.

What a tease ... Congrats!
 
Posts
3,719
Likes
4,200
They can be legit, but are less desirable.
How much does a trapezoid 12, no-T MOD W10 SM300 say in TZ "Excellent" condition go for nowadays?
 
Posts
1,794
Likes
2,548
How much does a trapezoid 12, no-T MOD W10 SM300 say in TZ "Excellent" condition go for nowadays?
Don't know for sure but my gut says 拢17k GBP private sale