Omega Seamaster Professional 300m. Fake or Original ?

Posts
2,808
Likes
8,339
It's not a super luminova dial.
Sometimes it's really bad, what people telling here.
I think you said luminova because of the missing T, but that was never the case on that model. It all appeared with swiss made.

And Archer already corrected me quite a while back.
 
Posts
10,765
Likes
52,877
Wow I started reading that and felt real bad for the guy, I live happy endings
 
Posts
42
Likes
375
Hi everbody.

I don't know, if this thread is still current. I have the same issue and can clarify this whole topic. I have the Omega Seamaster 300m Pro, reference 2531... , Bond watch, same as Moeed, case number 495672xx, cal. 1111. And i had the same Questions. So i send to Omega for Service. And they approve me the authenticity of the watch. Its an early 1993 model in the transition from Pre Bond to the 300m. In this transition some of the 300m got an 1111 calibre. So this is an extreme rare model of the Seamaster 300m Pro. Finally approved from Omega Service Center in Germany.
Hope i could unveil the things for you in Satisfaction.

The only difference between my Omega and this from Moeed is that my case number is in the right place.

Regards,
Mathias

forgot to say. The lists in the internet about the Omega serial numbers and the belonging years are wrong. 49xxxxxx Omega Seamaster 300m is from 1993.
I just bought the same model watch and was really worried by this thread. Thank you clearing it up as my serial number also starts with 49..............
 
Posts
1
Likes
1
I just bought the same model watch and was really worried by this thread. Thank you clearing it up as my serial number also starts with 49..............

I also have the Seamaster Professional 300M (Mid-Size) and it is authenticated. But the serial number also starts with 49xxxxxx. I think most of the internet sites say that 49xxxxxx is produced in 1986 but the model of this watch was only produced in 1993. So I guess it will cause a lot of confusion to a lot of people.