Forums Latest Members
  1. EJCM Feb 23, 2020

    Posts
    4
    Likes
    3
    I thought this might be a good forum to find out more about my Omega Seamaster that I recently inherited from my father. It was purchased sometime between 1955-1965 when he received his first big promotion at work. Anyone able to help identify the actual model and year? Thanks in advance. upload_2020-2-23_10-4-12.jpeg
     
    verithingeoff, Partagas and Als 27 like this.
  2. ahsposo Most fun screen name at ΩF Feb 23, 2020

    Posts
    3,745
    Likes
    19,993
  3. Dan S Feb 23, 2020

    Posts
    18,799
    Likes
    43,248
    It's a great early Seamaster chronograph with a caliber 321 movement from the late 50s or early 60s as you indicated. It is gold or gold-capped I assume. A photo from the back would help determine that. The serial number on the movement will provide a more accurate estimate of the manufacturing date. Wonderful heirloom. You will get the most information if you have someone open the watch (it should be a screw-in caseback) and post photos of the movement and the inside of the case-back, clearly showing all numbers (serial number and reference number).

    As a guess, the reference number may be KO 2907, but that's really just a guess (see below) and there may be other similar references. In any case, the reference number will be clearly indicated inside the caseback.

    seamasterck2907.jpg
     
    Edited Feb 23, 2020
    Als 27 likes this.
  4. Mouse_at_Large still immune to Speedmaster attraction Feb 23, 2020

    Posts
    2,018
    Likes
    5,269
    Dan S likes this.
  5. OMEGuy Feb 23, 2020

    Posts
    2,086
    Likes
    2,783
    I concur it might be a KO 2907.

    At first glance the crown looks strange and the chrono second hand doesn't look matching. I don't think the pushers are original.
     
  6. EJCM Feb 23, 2020

    Posts
    4
    Likes
    3
    Thank you for your reply. I shall see if I can a watch smith to remove the back for a photo. The outside case is worn down to the point that nothing is legible.
     
  7. pongster Feb 23, 2020

    Posts
    2,326
    Likes
    7,416
    Wow. A 321 Seamaster.

    Can this be called a moonwatch because it has the cal. 321 movement?
     
  8. OMEGuy Feb 23, 2020

    Posts
    2,086
    Likes
    2,783
    I think the early Seamaster chronographs are often undervalued. Beautiful watches, but they didn't make it to the moon, because it lacks of liquid water there. :D
     
    DaveK likes this.
  9. pongster Feb 23, 2020

    Posts
    2,326
    Likes
    7,416
    Arent there seas on the moon? Like the sea of tranquility?

    And for speed, i have not heard of a fast lunar rover.
     
  10. OMEGuy Feb 23, 2020

    Posts
    2,086
    Likes
    2,783
    Yes, maybe I should look for other brands, that had "Moonmaster" models. :)
     
  11. pongster Feb 23, 2020

    Posts
    2,326
    Likes
    7,416
    Isnt there another brand that claims a moonwatch?

    But to get on-topic, this is a nice specimen of a Chronograph seamaster. Curious if at that time the chronograph functions can be performed underwater.
     
    OMEGuy likes this.
  12. EJCM Feb 26, 2020

    Posts
    4
    Likes
    3
    upload_2020-2-26_7-39-32.jpeg The inside back.
     
  13. EJCM Feb 26, 2020

    Posts
    4
    Likes
    3
    upload_2020-2-26_7-40-45.jpeg The movement
     
  14. padders Oooo subtitles! Feb 26, 2020

    Posts
    8,989
    Likes
    13,939