Omega Globemaster Watches With Live Photos and Pricing

Posts
996
Likes
1,862
It resembles the 168.027 C-Case with coin-edge bezel more than anything, the Datejust is a very different design with deep fluting on the bezel.

102861-1da71d2a0c5f76a2de63f2858df0f78d.jpg

Really. Wouldn't a set of dauphine hands make it better?

Seems like guys who have taken the time to research these classics get just how very Omega this new release is. Honestly, I'm surprised by how many clumsy comparisons are being made to the Datejust on an Omega-themed site.
 
Posts
25,980
Likes
27,632
I don't agree with the Date-Just references. It's plain to see it's a homage to the knurled bezel 168.029 Day/Date and 168.027 Date C-Case Connies of the late 60's and early 70's. However, since Omega chose to use a pie pan dial, I think dauphine hands would have been a better look. That's all I was saying.
 
Posts
996
Likes
1,862
I don't agree with the Date-Just references. It's plain to see it's a homage to the knurled bezel 168.029 Day/Date and 168.027 Date C-Case Connies of the late 60's and early 70's. However, since Omega chose to use a pie pan dial, I think dauphine hands would have been a better look. That's all I was saying.

Please, you're the last person I would accuse of that sacrilege! I think the stick hands fit nicely, although I totally get your point about the dauphine/pie pan. Is this watch not totally in your wheelhouse?😗
 
Posts
25,980
Likes
27,632
Is this watch not totally in your wheelhouse?😗

Stop it, dammit. 🫨 You people are ALWAYS trying to make me spend more money!

..... and if it were 37 mm there'd be a BIG problem at my house - especially that rose gold version. Still worth trying on though. 🤦
 
Posts
996
Likes
1,862
Stop it, dammit. 🫨 You people are ALWAYS trying to make me spend more money!

..... and if it were 37 mm there'd be a BIG problem at my house - especially that rose gold version. Still worth trying on though. 🤦

I'm going to go ahead and say at 39mm there still remains a strong possibility of there being a BIG problem at your house.::stirthepot::
 
Posts
9
Likes
10
As someone who is relatively new to quality watches, I'm digging the globemaster. I get how Omega is implementing aspects of previous designs -- and I really like how it looks on a leather strap. Pic from ablogtowatch hands-on.
 
Posts
15,048
Likes
24,020
I'm going to go ahead and say at 39mm there still remains a strong possibility of there being a BIG problem at your house.::stirthepot::
Agree, going to guess these wear like an Aqua Terra. 😁
 
Posts
6,732
Likes
21,741
Not the only brand besides Rolex using the fluted bezel. That being said, why use a fairly iconic part for a redesign that even REMOTELY reminds one of your nearest competitor? With such impressive offerings both in movements and designs of late, I just can't find the wisdom here.
 
Posts
6,605
Likes
11,342
Still hasn't grown on me - still looks derivative and cheap. Back and movement are nice but that's about it. Why make the dial uglier than the classic piepan dials? I guess this is a step up - this is just ugly while I think the tresor re-edition is Fugly.
 
Posts
922
Likes
4,841
I like the blue dial version on the strap. The center links on the bracelet are out of proportion (too wide) for my tastes. Starting at $7700, it'd take a nice discount to get me into one. Also, I'm wondering how thick the case is. Lately, with the new in-house movements and sapphire backs, they've all become too thick for my taste.
 
Posts
15,048
Likes
24,020
My biggest objection is the hybrid straight lug/C case. I wish they had cut out the center section.
 
Posts
4,828
Likes
31,600
I like the blue dial version on the strap. The center links on the bracelet are out of proportion (too wide) for my tastes. Starting at $7700, it'd take a nice discount to get me into one. Also, I'm wondering how thick the case is. Lately, with the new in-house movements and sapphire backs, they've all become too thick for my taste.

I went to the boutique today and asked about the thickness. Unfortunately, they did not know, and they could not pull it up on web site, as there was too much traffic with all the Basel releases so the web site would not pull up (their words). They did come clean on the WSOTM, and other than that have said they have been getting really positive feedback.

As we were talking about the Globemaster, I did mention the bezel, and without prompt she discounted any similarities to another watch brand (I can only assume Rolex).

I am really growing to like the blue dial (don't care for others at all) but would have concern scratching the bezel.

I am with you on price, seems steep when you look at other Omega watch pricing, but I also see this as an opportunity to increase the brand/price perception to be on par with some other comparable brands.
 
Posts
15,048
Likes
24,020
I am really growing to like the blue dial (don't care for others at all) but would have concern scratching the bezel.
.

I don't think that will be a problem, though of course this is a different brand 😁
 
Posts
922
Likes
4,841
I am really growing to like the blue dial (don't care for others at all) but would have concern scratching the bezel.

It's Tungsten carbide - amazingly hard.
 
Posts
1,870
Likes
1,402
While I appreciate the individual design elements which are cribbed from Omega's illustrious path I really don't think they match up well at all as a unified whole, or at least in the present design. Unfortunately this new Globemaster series reminds of the classic Conan "If They Mated" sketch, which showed an abomination of an offspring emerging from the genetic material of otherwise attractive people.
 
Posts
27,739
Likes
70,479
It's Tungsten carbide - amazingly hard.

Not so sure this is a good choice of materials for this particular part. I have a lot of experience with Tungsten, and also with Tungsten carbide - 2 very different things with different properties and most people don't really understand the difference. Where Tungsten (Wolfram) is very tough and will take a lot of abuse, Tungsten carbide is much more brittle.

I use Tungsten carbide for cutting tools on my lathe (the gravers are made from this material) and it is very prone to chipping. I have a small Tungsten carbide tool I made with a brass handle I turned in the lathe and drilled, then I inserted a tungsten carbide piece in the end of it and used it as a scriber - fell on the concrete floor and the tip was shattered. I've also worked with carbide cutting tools when I was buying and installing CNC machining equipment in my former job - very wear resistant, but brittle and not good with shocks.

Tungsten on the other hand I used in these:



The points:





Tungsten is very dense, so it helps with % FOC when tuning the arrows to your bow (a challenge when shooting X10's)...they also hold up way better than steel points do. If you happened to hit something imbedded into the target, or hit something behind the target on a pass through, it was very unusual to see damage on these points.

They were tough to get when the US invaded Iraq in 2003, as the military was using all this material (and keeping the manufacturer busy) making ammunition with it...

Using tungsten carbide on a fairly thin component like a bezel...well we'll have to see how this stands up. Other manufacturers have made entire cases out of it, but the case designs I've seen where quite sturdy and had a lot of cross section, where a bezel will not. I would not give it great odds if you smacked the bezel on a metal door frame while walking through it. Once the parts show up on the Extranet, I'll have to see what the replacement cost is like. Not likely cheap.

Cheers, Al