- Posts
- 109
- Likes
- 102
maumerstrubbi
·I recently spoke to a omega certified watchmaker who used to work for an official retailer.
And he suggested a different theory - not the one where omega might have used uncertified movements for this reference. He rather suggested that omega might have gotten those movements chronometer certified to being able to use them in the reference 368.1075. It could have been done so they could use those left over (usually not certified) movements inside those chronometer models, since the only difference between the movement references is that they got certified or did not get certified.
And he doesn’t think that they used uncertified movements but they got them certified so they could use them in the watches.
Do you guys understand what I am trying to say. So although those movements calibre usually whereby certified it also could have been that they got some 1110 movements certified. So the could sell them in the chronometer references. Do you think that a plausible one possible explanation for this anomaly?
And he suggested a different theory - not the one where omega might have used uncertified movements for this reference. He rather suggested that omega might have gotten those movements chronometer certified to being able to use them in the reference 368.1075. It could have been done so they could use those left over (usually not certified) movements inside those chronometer models, since the only difference between the movement references is that they got certified or did not get certified.
And he doesn’t think that they used uncertified movements but they got them certified so they could use them in the watches.
Do you guys understand what I am trying to say. So although those movements calibre usually whereby certified it also could have been that they got some 1110 movements certified. So the could sell them in the chronometer references. Do you think that a plausible one possible explanation for this anomaly?
